CNN’s Roland Martin Urges Violence Against Men Who Liked David Beckham’s H&M Ad
Roland Martin Apologizes For Tweet Directed At Gay Fans Of David Beckham
It usually doesn’t take long for the tolerant, inclusive left to tell us what they really think…

Joe Paterno in serious condition; incorrect media reports refuted
The same pompous media that admonished bloggers for having no editors or filters sure have a few glaring fuck ups of their own to explain

In Europe, free speech ends where Islam begins
Ain’t it the truth

Canada ain’t much better than we are down here….

The left calls the right “homophobic” and “intolerant” while simultaneously giving Muslims “Islamophobic” victim status. It turns out gays have more to worry about from their fellow victims than they thought.

A group of Muslim men handed a leaflet out to the public that called for homosexuals to be ‘punished’ and given the death sentence, a court has heard.

The Death Penalty? leaflet, which mentions execution and says it is the only way the immoral sin of homosexuality can be erased from society, was handed out to people outside the Jamia Mosque after Friday prayers on July 2, she said.

This kind of “speech” isn’t news to us and it may make the LGBT’s think twice before attack those who’ll probably end up fighting for their freedom to exist.

I always thought Canadians (with their politically correct dictates) were more tolerant than us. Imagine the shitstorm if an American sports team’s owner apologized to their fans because their new coach wasn’t bilingual?

Although our main priority remains to win hockey games and to keep improving as a team, it is obvious that the ability for the head coach to express himself in both French and English will be a very important factor in the selection of the permanent head coach … We would like to thank all our fans for their understanding.
— Geoff Molson, owner of the NHL’s Montreal Canadians, statement

I’m all for tradition and the fact that interim coach Randy Cunneyworth is the first non-French speaker in four decades shouldn’t have been of concern. However, before apologizing to fans and kneecapping the coach publicly, maybe the Canadiens should worry more about winning hockey games…?

Just a thought.

Of course, it’s a good thing that we don’t profile, discriminate, and hurt the feelings of others, right?

The Department of Defense considers the U.S. homeland the most dangerous place for a G.I. outside of foreign war zones — and the top threat they face here is from violent Islamist extremists.

The Fort Hood attack was not an anomaly. It was part of al Qaeda’s two-decade success at infiltrating the U.S. military for terrorism — an effort that is increasing in scope and threat.
— Rep. Peter T. King, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee

Gangs successfully infiltrated the military and all the wanted was access to weapons for their turfwars. Islamic terrorists seem to believe they can take out their enemy, not on the “battlefield” but in our bases here in the United States and the politically correct left is making things a lot easier for them.

The Obama Administration in yet another attempt to make us a color-blind nation, has issued new and improved guidelines promoting racial diversity in college admissions. As we’ve been down this road many times before, it reminds me of how I received this whole diversity strategy before and I pretty much feel the same way today.

The New Dogg
Black students with lower grades should be admitted to the University of Michigan law school, not because of the traditional affirmative action argument regarding the need to redress the past lack of opportunity, but in order to be better lawyers, white students need black exposure? That means white law students, who’ve obviously never seen a black person outside of MTV rap videos or guest appearances on “Cops”, need to have us around physically for their educational and social enrichment.

Taxpayer-funded public education in minority districts (run predominately by liberals) is a colossal failure and as an attempt to cover their tracks, they aim to force unprepared students into places of higher learning using racism as an accusation at the ready. Yeah, that will solve the problem.

Parents upset over PETA turkey ad
The majority of vegans I’ve met during my lifetime are judgmental, sometimes emaciated people who push their I’m-better-than-you-because-I-don’t-eat meat agenda whenever they’re not eating. I’ve never gotten in their face and demand they eat a cheeseburger, and certainly not approached their kids. Why can’t they leave the rest of us happy carnivores the fuck alone?

I continue to watch the media reaction to the Penn State, Jerry Sandusky-Joe Paterno-sexual abuse scandal with mild disgust. Mild disgust not for the horrendous, criminal acts performed on young boys by a dirty old man, but because we saw this coming. We live in a society today that dictates gay men (Sandusky may swing both ways, but these were gay sex acts) are always victims, NEVER predators.

College legend and Penn State head coach Joe Paterno was fired because he failed to tell the police when Sandusky’s acts were made known to him. While I won’t excuse his choice of going to the athletic director instead of the police, I understand it.

Given the hypersensitivity and eggshells we’re all supposed to walk on concerning anything “gay”, what do you think would have happened if Paterno had reported this to the police and there wasn’t enough evidence to prosecute? Sandusky could have sued, and Patero would have been attacked as a homophobe (which is a helluva lot worse than being a snitch).

Joe Paterno would never have been put in the situation he now finds himself if Jerry Sandusky was found in a shower with a 10-year-old girl. Public awareness dictates the police be called immediately. Anything less on a liberal campus, where all men are deemed to be rapists thanks to college feminists, would have been unthinkable. It would appear, the non-judgmental progressive line was adhered to in this case and gay sex, no matter the age of the participants, was nobody’s business because public perception must be that gay men are always victims, NEVER predators.

The left has long ago sewn these seeds with the normalization of what were previously common sense non-starters.

Imagine the drama that would ensue if Girl Scouts (in the name of equality) could be taken on camping trips by male scoutmasters unsupervised. What would be a reason for outcry? Because it would be assumed some men might be sexually attracted to little girls, duh! But that reasoning was never allowed when political correctness (and fear of constant litigation) pushed the Boy Scouts into allowing gay scoutmasters to take little boys into the woods unsupervised.

Gay men are always victims, NEVER predators.

Do you think the term “pedophile priest” was used simply because it was accurate? The left has always had it in for the antiquated moralities of the church, but the Catholic Priest scandal had a speed bump. The vast majority of those priests weren’t doing little girls; that would be easy to condemn. No, most of these priests were doing little boys and progressives had to attack the church, not the “men” committing the crimes from within.

Subsequently, churches had to close so settlements for the victims could be covered as well as the nature of the priests who abused the boys. Can any of you name one of the priests involved? Maybe not, but we all know know the name Matthew Sheppard.

Many questions have yet to be answered as to how the actions of Jerry Sandusky could have gone on so long unreported. The answer is simple.

If Sandusky had been realized to have molested ONE little girl, he would be been promptly reported to the police. That’s what we’ve been trained as a society to do. But since we are talking about gay sex acts, the ones politicians even look the other way at, this whole Penn State scandal should be a proud example of “Didn’t Ask, Didn’t Tell” being properly implemented, because what one does in the privacy of a college locker room shower is nobody’s business, right?

The Penn State students who rioted on campus following the dismissal of Coach Joe Paterno had it right. They were defending Paterno’s not being judgmental and informing the police of gay sex on campus, because the demonization of gays leads to their lack of self-esteem and such bullying can lead to suicide. Joe Paterno was acting in a way most activists should admire and he was a victim of retribution by an intolerant majority of homophobes within Penn State’s Board of Trustees.

I often watch for code words when analysing media coverage of stories and when men abuse young girls, it’s called sexual assault: rape. (The only place where this doesn’t apply is in Hollywood.) When women abuse young boys, we’re told how much fun they must have had. When gay men abuse boys, we very seldom hear the word “gay” in respect to the acts because gay men are always victims, NEVER predators.

When proven to have the same potential for deviant behavior as anyone else, that celebrity victim status cannot allowed to be tarnished and an agenda talking point cannot be allowed to be diminished.

No number of abused little boys is worth that.

Who wants to be feminine?
— Gloria Steinem, interview

And I’m called a self-hater….

Obama Couldn’t Wait: His New Christmas Tree Tax
Taxing Christmas trees to improve the image of Christmas trees. Just who’s had the bad opinion of them…?

As ex-Navy, don’t get me started on the pussified Air Force….

The Air Force Academy apologized Thursday night after it was accused of religious intolerance for promoting Operation Christmas Child – a program designed to send holiday gifts to impoverished children around the world.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation said military commanders crossed the line when they promoted the gift program, sponsored by Samaritan’s Purse, an organization run by Franklin Graham.

It’s called “Christmas” for a reason, Air Force, and ask those whom would be offended how much they donate to children around this time of year?

Until we get an official account of what happened we’re stuck with speculation, but knowing entitled elitist celebrities with an agenda as we do, this could be a case of over-the-top behavior with matching over-the-top reaction.

The L Word actress Leisha Hailey says she was kicked off a Southwest Airlines flight after kissing her girlfriend. In a series of tweets Monday, Hailey wrote that she and fashion designer Nina Garduno, who have been together since 2006, “were escorted off the plane for getting upset about the issue. This is an outrage,” Hailey added. “I demand a public apology by @SouthwestAir and a refund. Hate is not a family value. I will never fly this airline.”

Again it’s not clear if we’re talking a little peck on the cheek or trading spit, but I really don’t think heterosexuals making out on a plane would go unaddressed either. And if asked to stop, what’s the problem?

This stinks of yet another Hollywood activist deciding that rules of decorum don’t apply to her and screaming discrimination because she can.

I had a recent discussion with “Canadian individualist anarchist and individualist feminist” Wendy McElroy about a topic that really didn’t see much of the time of day by the mainstream media (or at least as much attention as it would have received had the roles been reversed). What made things worse was the turning of a very serious crime into a daytime chat show joke.

I’ve read many of Wendy’s pieces over the years and it was an honor to be able to personally get her take on this incident.

Bob: Wendy, I try and consider myself a person up on the news of the day but this story seems to have gotten by me as I’ve seen scant media coverage of this. Would you please give us a brief rundown of the story of Catherine Becker?

Wendy McElRoy: A recent press released from Stop Abusive and Violent Environments — a national organization against domestic violence whether it is committed by men and women — described the story well. S.A.V.E. wrote, “Catherine Becker drugged her husband, lashed him to a bed, severed his penis, and threw it into a garbage disposal. Becker coolly explained to the responding officers, ‘He deserved it’.”

The actions were apparently in response to divorce proceedings. Becker now faces charges of aggravated mayhem, false imprisonment, assault with a deadly weapon, administering a drug with intent to commit a felony, poisoning and spousal abuse.

Bob: I read about the outrage generated from an “opinion” of the case by Sharon Osborne. What did she say and why is it, in your opinion, this kind of sentiment persists in society today?

Wendy: Sharon Osborne is one of regular women on CBS’s The Talk, a woman’s ‘chat’ show. When Becker’s story arose for table discussion, all of the women made light of the vicious genital mutilation but Osborne led the charge. She crowed to the national audience that the act was “quite fabulous.” She chortled while imagining the penis being ground up by the garbage disposal. The only point on which Osborne disagree with Becker’s actions: She would have thrown the penis in the dog food bowl. Another woman regular commented, “Why would you do that to a dog?”

Sharon Osborne “apologized” but it didn’t really come off as an apology, did it?

There was a backlash of public fury against the sheer malice and hatred of men expressed by the show. Clearly, the women were pressured to recant their glee over genital mutilation — when it is performed on a male, that is. Undoubtedly because she was the main offender, Osborne began the apology but could not utter more than a few syllables before beginning to laugh. She caught herself but, within a few words more, was again on the verge of chuckling. Finally, another regular interrupted Osborne with her own milk-toast weak apology. Basically, it consisted of repeating the statement that none of the women at The Talk meant harm. Of course, this is actually a defense of them and their actions, not a condemnation of male genital mutilation… but, at least, the second woman did not burst out in laughter.

Bob: I kind of remember a similar sentiment expressed by some in the media representing “womanhood” after the Lorena Bobbitt incident. Why is it women can commit such gruesome crimes and the response is almost some kind of warped sense of congratulation? Imagine if a man mutilated a woman. These same women would be calling for the harshest sentence possible, but when a woman mutilates a man, it’s deemed “hysterical”.

Wendy: The vast difference between how many respond to male versus female genital mutilation is a vivid, graphic illustration of the dehumanization and devaluing of men, especially in sexual matters. I cannot imagine a talk show being allowed to broadcast if four men snicked and guffawed at a woman’s breasts or genitalia being ground up by a male. It is a hideous double-standard but it is the logical result of decades of gender feminist propaganda that depicts all men as oppressors who ‘have it coming’.

Bob: You don’t appear to want to let this one go. What do you plan on doing about this and you know a lot of women out there may consider you some kind of traitor?

Wendy: What I do not want to let go is the demand for men and women be treated with equal compassion and justice. As for Becker, I think it is prudent to let the story go because of ‘time-value’; it is already old news. Perhaps when Becker is tried, if that occurs, the story will become timely once more. But the themes that drove the Becker case and the media’s reaction are omnipresent in our society. As long as women are applauded for violence against men, up to and including the act of slicing off a penis, then husbands and sons are literally not safe in society.

What I am doing right now to champion the safety and equal rights of men is to co-ordinate the first media campaign of CAMP (Countering Abuse Misinformation Project), a new venture that has been launched by S.A.V.E. The campaign: The Department of Education (DED) has issued a directive that requires colleges to use the “preponderance of evidence” standard in resolving allegations of sexual assault, a standard that in practice removes the presumption of innocence. The American Association of University Professors, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, and SAVE have all called for the DED to remove this unconstitutional policy.

Blowing off the controversy over their last politically correct video that inferred the most likely terrorist would be anyone but those who conduct attacks almost daily around the world, DHS’s latest video “The Drop Off: If You See Something, Say Something™” is clear: keep an eye on those whacky white people.

BTW — Janet Napolitano also warns that terrorists may try and obtain weapons from gun stores. Who knows, maybe some of those guns may come from “Fast & Furious”. The upside: that could be considered recycling.

And the sad thing is even if the Winnipeg Jets changed their offensive logo, few of these anti-war politically-correct busybodies would even show up to a game, let alone know what sport we’re even talking about.

Apparently there is a smattering of anti-military folks in this city who don’t like the fact that the new Jets logo pays homage to our air force’s rich history in Winnipeg. Their argument is that by honouring the military in any way, fans donning “militaristic” Jets apparel would necessarily be expressing their support for Canada’s military actions abroad.

The Jets have been around since 1972. I went to a New England Whalers game against the Jets in Boston during the old World Hockey Association days and got to see Bobby Hull play. I don’t recall all this uproar back in the day and it seems there are just a bunch of whiners that have way too much time on their hands.

It’s sad to say but I think it time to write Herman Cain off the list of presidential contenders. If you’re not going to stand behind what you said, how can we believe anything you say in the Oval Office.

While I stand by my opposition to the interference of shariah law into the American legal system, I remain humble and contrite for any statements I have made that might have caused offense to Muslim Americans and their friends. I am truly sorry for any comments that may have betrayed my commitment to the U.S. Constitution and the freedom of religion guaranteed by it. Muslims, like all Americans, have the right to practice their faith freely and peacefully.
— Hermain Cain, July 27, 2011

Why is it that Muslims move to a locale and after a relatively short amount of time, start making demands, our leaders back down, and apologies are never enough?

Herman, a presidential campaign is no place to showcase weakness and you’ve just proven you’re not ready for The Show.

Just because the liberal media’s on your side, doesn’t mean they speak for the public.

4/29/10: Bud Selig should move 2011 MLB All-Star Game out of Arizona if new immigration law isn’t stopped
If it does go into effect three months from now, then Major League Baseball ought to announce that a sport in which 30% of the players are Hispanic will not hold the 2011 All-Star Game at Chase Field in Phoenix.

And when the law is passed and boycott bluffs are called…

7/6/11: Immigration activists switch tactics in All-Star Game protest
Instead, the group, Somos America, is encouraging attendees to wear white ribbons on game day to take a stand against Arizona’s illegal-immigration legislation, according to the The San Diego Union-Tribune.

White ribbons. That’ll really have people thinking.

Apparently these are now in circulation and defacing United States currency is quite illegal.

United States Code
TITLE 18 – CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I – CRIMES
CHAPTER 17 – COINS AND CURRENCY
§ 333. Mutilation of national bank obligations

Whoever mutilates, cuts, defaces, disfigures, or perforates, or unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, or Federal Reserve bank, or the Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

I’d say report these bills upon receipt however I sincerely doubt the climate for enforcement of Title 18 is in the heart of this administration and/or its subordinates.

h/t Frank S