Occupy DC says they won’t break the law during their CPAC protests, and that’s all we need, right?

Michelle Obama in Tug of War at White House
Besides throwing the First Lady out there to improve that “likeability” thing, do you think they’re also trying to tell us something?

Barack Obama whined about PACs unduly influencing our electoral process, yet when his donors are turning their collective backs on him, he does what he criticized others for and campaigned on putting an end to.

Obama has been an outspoken critic of current campaign financing laws, in particular a Supreme Court ruling that allowed the creation of super PACs. But in the wake of the group’s anemic fundraising, made public last week, the campaign decided to change its position….

Probably the one thing that irks most about the president is his consistent habit of talking down to and scolding the American people like children and later doing the same thing he chided us all for. Come election day, people don’t forget these kind of things.

Hee hee hee…

Despite the efforts of the Democrat Party to defeat the Voting Rights Act of 1965, today they openly brag about protecting the rights of all people to vote for the candidate of their choice. However, it’s also quite clear that blacks are the only people in America who are publicly ridiculed should they not vote for candidates Democrats so authorize.

Just ask Congressional candidate Charlotte Bergmann after her appearance on Memphis’ Thaddeus Matthews radio program….

Note: This YouTube video was clearly created by someone not friendly to the Tea Party or black Republicans.

As Democrats have held almost all elected offices in the black community for more than 50 years, poverty, crime, and hopelessness has only gotten worse, can Mr. Matthews honestly say what liberals have done for black folk? Might it be just a tad disingenuous for him to blame Republicans for the plight of the Democratically-represented minority community?

No, that would take guts and Thaddeus Matthews would have to face the same small-minded humiliation he gave Ms. Bergmann.

As the days go by, the profile of the Occupier as a spoiled, narcissistic brat is continually verified in their own words….

Upsetting the Super Bowl — I couldn’t care less. This is about my life and my family. Maybe it will make some people notice.
— Lou Feldman, Occupy protester

The more they talk, the more Americans tune them out.

On what many thought would be the day that Occupy DC got evicted from McPherson Square, protesters harassed police and the Occupiers erected a “Tent of Dreams” to show their opposition to the Park Service’s expected crackdown.

Last night/tonight Oakland Police Department violently and brutally arrested peaceful protesters just trying to occupy a building for their operations. This is not okay with us.

There is so much wrong with this narcissistic thinking. They really are a joke. I had to leave some responses just to fuck with ‘em…

h/t Rachel IC

Yup, they finally burned the flag
The Tea Party waves the flag, the Occupiers burn it. Enough of the comparisons

As I’ve said, the media template will be should Barack Obama lose the election, it won’t be because the people disagreed with his policies. It will be because Americans (conservatives in particular) are racists.

According to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario, low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.

So unless you wish to be branded a racist, vote Obama 2012!

January 24, 2012 — Saturday was the first-in-the-South primary for the Republican presidential hopefuls with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich coming out on top with 40.4 percent of the vote. Mitt Romney finished second with 27.8 percent and Rick Santorum received 17 percent. The race is down to the final four with the crucial state of Florida being the site of the next primary. Glenn McCall, national committeeman for the South Carolina GOP, and Bob Parks, creator of BlackandRight.com and formerly a key figure in the Massachusetts Republican Party, discuss the latest in the Republican race.

Regardless of his very irritating cable news pundit persona, Michael’s a very nice guy.

President Obama’s 2012 State of the Union address again rated at an 8th grade comprehension level on the Flesch-Kincaid readability test — the third lowest score of any State of the Union address since 1934.

Now the question should be if the Address was dumbed down so the American people could understand it or Obama could approve it?

On the prospect of a President Gingrich…

Let me just say this. That will never happen. He’s not going to be President of the United States. That’s not going to happen. Let me just make my prediction and stand by it, it isn’t going to happen. There is something I know.
— Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), on CNN’s John King U.S.A.

Yup, sounds like blackmail to me. Isn’t there a law against this?

Every four years we hear activists whine about the fact there’s a real need for a third party candidate. Boys and girls, you already have one.

The one part of presidential campaigns that both Democrats and Republicans alike dread is the third party candidate. This person has more than siphoned off enough votes to sway elections however there’s one third party candidate who has the ability to dictate the narrative and move public opinion while being immune from counter attacks. That person is the media and that immunity may be wearing off as they are collectively whining about how they are now being picked on.

Republicans wince the week before a general election not knowing what “October Surprise” the media will pull out of their sleeves. We’ve had decades-old DUIs being reported mere hours before a presidential election. To this day, “forged but accurate” documents released days before a presidential election are still being defended. The third party media candidate can throw out any accusation and (unlike a Democrat or Republican) have the power to recirculate that accusation without having to spend one dollar on producing and paying to air a campaign ad.

Unlike most campaigns, this third party candidate has opposition research archived and at their disposal. They don’t have to spend a dime in donations to track down testimonials against other candidates that become the narrative for a cycle. This third party candidate can determine the site for debates, can select the moderators and pick the questions; a feat no Republican or Democrat candidate can do.

This third party candidate, knowing they will not win the election, can side with the Democrat (that IS the pattern) and allow that Democrat to sit back while the dirty work is done for him or her. The third party can pick and choose whatever talking point is beneficial to the Democrat and detrimental to the Republican.

Case in point: today Democrats and the third party candidate are demanding Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney produce his tax records for media and public scrutiny. I made the point yesterday while pre-taping an interview on Sirius’ Michael Eric Dyson radio program that we’ve all been told Barack Obama is the smartest president in American history (despite numerous gaffes glossed over). That action line was repeated during the last presidential election and as recently as last April when senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett said on The Joe Madison Show, “He’s almost 50 years old and he’s president of the United States and I don’t think anybody would debate his intelligence and so now we need to get serious…” responding to the request that Obama release his college transcripts.

I told Michael that if I were to say I was smarter than he, his logical retort would be to prove it. He would produce his doctorate and I’d have to produce at least the equivalent to back up my claim.

The third party insists we take their word that Obama is smarter than the rest of us, just as they demanded we accept the notion that George W. Bush was the dumbest president ever (despite the fact he has a Master’s of Business Administration). We’re constantly being told how much of a genius Democrat presidential candidate Al Gore was despite his college record being abysmal.

The third party has the power to repeat any narrative it wishes and get that narrative into every American home without spending one dollar for advertisement, in fact in some cases, we pay extra to get that narrative.

However for the first time in recent memory, a Republican candidate challenged the fairness of a third party that can pick and choose what they use as an attack vessel, when they choose to. The third party wanted no part of the Bill Clinton and John Edwards infidelities (Clinton’s should have been considered much more serious as some of his incidents occurred in a federal workplace, and rape is… rape), but became curiously concerned about the treatment of women when it came to evil Republican men like Herman Cain and now Newt Gingrich.

Someone should also ask the third party why they discard these women into oblivion (without follow up) once the damage has been done?

Gingrich, by challenging the objectivity and motives of the third party, has tapped into the simmering conservative frustration of their siding with Democrats and sabotaging Republican campaigns with immunity.

I say immunity because I can only imagine the media whining if we were to ask any of the anchors or pundits (we see or hear on a nightly basis) for their college transcripts or, heaven forbid, who they fucked around with after the Christmas party while their spouse was at home putting the kids to sleep.

While many in the media understandably think Gingrich’s recent attack on the media is just a diversionary ploy, one could also say that a media that cherry picks attacks on Republicans are also diverting on behalf of their preferred Democrat. Whether Gingrich can ride this wave to the White House is clearly unknown, but we can only speculate what presidential election outcomes might have been without the insertion of the third party candidate that doesn’t seek to win but seemingly does all it can to pick the winner.

With subscriptions plummeting and bruised journalist feelings increasing, the topic of liberals giving their personally-preferred candidate a public boost has always been an issue.

The perception of liberal bias is a problem by itself for the news media. It’s not okay to dismiss it. Conservatives who think the press is deliberately trying to help Democrats are wrong. But conservatives are right that journalism has too many liberals and not enough conservatives. It’s inconceivable that that is irrelevant.
— Tom Rosenstiel, Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2008

Unfortunately perceptions haven’t changed much since, and if anything, have gotten worse.

Have you noticed the media (and the left) like using women to take out Republican presidential candidates? How’s that working for them? Where the women at now…?

The crew (Dan Joseph and Katie Yoder) meet up with Herman Cain in Charleston

Maybe those on the Today Show set should get a room…