Of course, Joan Walsh would never go there about a Muslim. That would take guts and a vacant corner to curl up and cry and hide in
Exclusive B&R Advertisers
Buy this e-book from this Nationwide Concealed Carry ad and the publisher will make a donation to Black & RightLingerie, Sexy Lingerie and Plus Size Lingerie
Cheap Custom Vinyl Banners
Custom Political Signs
Genuine Style by DirectBuy
Hunting Knives
-
My oldest, now on iTunes
At least the atheists in Pennsylvania weren’t cowards. I wonder how Ms. Walsh would look in a burka?
Just as ugly as she does now, Koala…
It’s amazing what people consider to be qualified news these days.
I will be more impressed when all of the billions of lives that have passed through this world are finally baptized.
Oh, and consider yourself baptized, Walsh. As if it actually has significance without your consent.
They have been working long and hard to establish a universal, but selective, equivalence or, perhaps, equivocation principle.
Amazing what the LibTards latch on to for their misguided criticism. What or how does this relate to Mittens Romneycare’s political views or future actions? Religious bigotry. On a steeek!
Joan, sweetie, try that on a Muslim. See how they treat you, sweetcheeks… Got the guts?
You still have your soul, Joan? Was it returned to you rejected as too foul for Hell?
There’s been a lot of criticism aimed at Romney, but the most amusing are the critics who attack his good morals.
That guy is just too darn nice!
He would NEVER cheat on his wife! Boring!
CHURCH! DONATIONS! KITTENS! BLEARGH!
Not at all surprised that a Democrat would find these things distasteful.
It’s not just Democrats. There are a few, too many, really, who consider his faith a reflection of an inherent weakness, which arises from a weak mind. I will admit that as a teenager that perception guided my own skepticism. While it did not establish my superiority, it did justify rejecting a similar faith on principle. Since that time, I have decided that the only objective measure of faith is to judge it upon the principles it engenders. The associated theology, while interesting, is not really my concern. Well, I can’t say that with any certainty, but I will not change my position until there is a reason to do so. I will make one more admission, that it is not readily possible to distinguish between personal principles and the society which fostered them. So, for that reason, if no other, I do appreciate the Judeo-Christian faiths.
I am especially fond of the advisory statement that we are to be judged by our individual conscience.
So, his faith affirms individual dignity (i.e. enlightened or conscious order) and it is highly compliant with the natural order. What’s not to like? That he — as are we all — is vulnerable to corruptive forces and suffers from imperfections is not in and of itself interesting. That some of his most vocal critics would consider his morality a weakness is amusing. That he is inconsistent on public issues of merit is worrisome.