While the liberal media is jerking off with the amount of times they can place the phrase “right wing” within a Norway massacre story, let’s not forget that Anders Behring Breivik could be a tool of something not at all “right wing”.
In 2008, it was revealed that al Qaeda was recruiting the blond and blue eyed for their next generation of terrorists. And with the exception of the Oklahoma City bombing committed by an American, whose weapon of choice in crowded buildings are bombs?
Over the years, we’ve seen many stories about servicemembers and civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan shot and/or blown up by terrorists wearing… you guessed right, a police uniform like Anders Behring Breivik wore.
But let’s not let the liberal media off the hook.
It took days before they released the fact the D.C. sniper’s last name was Muhammad.
The Virginia Tech shooter might have fit in had his behavior not become so erratic. A college review panel concluded he was in a world where “he would be remembered as the savior of the oppressed, the downtrodden, the poor, and the rejected.” Who talks like that?
We were told not to make anything out of the fact the Fort Hood shooter was a Muslim.
During the whole Ground Zero mosque controversy, a Muslim cab driver was stabbed and the media blamed the “right wing” until a simple investigation revealed the attacker was a student at a New York arts college and a volunteer for a liberal media outlet. Have you heard much about that incident since?
The man who flew a small aircraft into a Dallas IRS building was labeled a “right wing” extremist until his suicide rantings revealed he was an anti-capitalist, anti-religion, pro-universal health care, Bush-hating registered Democrat. The media moved on.
They blamed the D.C. Holocaust Museum shooting on a “right wing” anti-Semite until it came out the shooter hated “neocons” and Fox News. BTW — Where do you hear the majority of anti-Semitic speech in America? Been to a college campus lately?
They got the whole Gabrielle Giffords shooting completely wrong, blaming the “right wing” and Sarah Palin publicly until it was revealed the crazy was “left wing, quite liberal” and then, more silence.
Many in America may think of Norway as a land of blondes, happily frolicking through meadows but they also have their issues as well….
Yes, the attack came just over a year after three men were arrested on suspicion of having links to Al Qaeda and planning to attack targets in Norway. And it is true that it also came less than three months after US forces killed Osama Bin Laden in a raid on his hideout in Pakistan. Yet more recent events here — a prosecutor filed terror charges against an Iraqi-born cleric for threatening Norwegian politicians with death if he is deported plus a leader of a Kurdish Islamist group called Mullah Krekar recently making inciting statements through the Norwegian press….
While Anders Behring Breivik fits the media’s perfect profile of a homicidal, right-wing extremist crazy, let’s not forget how wrong they’ve been in the past. One wouldn’t know that because liberals don’t do the apology thing well when it’s proven they were very mistaken.
We can all hope Anders Breivik acted alone. The media, at least for now, has their “far-right” bogeyman. He is clearly anti-Muslim and something definately set him off. Maybe it was something trivial like… 100% of all rapes in 2010 Norway being committed by Muslims. That could sour one’s perception of the benefits of multiculturalism.
The attack is less than 72 hours old and Norwegian police are still investigating. but what if the media’s incorrectly reinterpreted the event to fit their desired narrative? It’s not like they haven’t been very wrong before, and if Breivik didn’t act alone, thanks to the media, his partners must be laughing their asses of, planning their next event.
There are people in this world that are so deeply lost in psychosis. The isolation and disconnect is so intense it is folly to attribute their behaviour to anything other than the illness.
Obviously, I have to wait for the dust to settle, since the media can't be trusted. I have to wonder (I know it's tacky…) How far away was the nearest "good guy" with a gun?
Too far away, apparently. If I read the information correctly, the nutter had free reign for an hour and a half!
Very good article. Thank you. I shared the link to your blog on my FB page.
Thanks.
From the web for the suspicious. The link to this is temporarily unavailable.
Lance Aguiar
Suspicions surrounding mass murder suspect Anders Behring Brevik’s social media accounts and profile!
Report by Lance Aguiar Anders Behring Breivik, the alleged mass murder suspect in the attack last Friday on the Utøya youth camp, in Norway apparently only recently set up a facebook account on July 17th together with a twitter account on the same day. All wall posts have youtube links to vocal trance music without any comments from friends apart from four he supposedly made himself with two referring to track time references. As far as I can tell he did not have any friends listed. Strange one would think that at least close friends or family would have been invited. His profile states that he is a Christian and a Conservative. Mainstream media will pick this up as a right wing religious fanatic. Sport activity includes hunting and bodybuilding. Books listed include 1984 written by George Orwell, The Trial by F. Kafka, and Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972-1980 by Richard Rorty, just to name a few. Again, the mainstream media will say that he is into conspiracy theories. Movies listed are Gladiator, 300, and Dogville. This is where it becomes very questionable, especially listing hunting, big brother related books and violent war movies. To top it off there is a photo of him wearing what looks like a Masonic outfit – apron included. The photos are all professional portrait shots, without a mix of casual photographs one would normally find in a facebook album . His entire profile seems to be made up! This account has now been conveniently taken down. He has just one tweet made on July 17, he states, “One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100,000 who have only interests.” The question still remains, why would he set up two social media accounts just before his alleged killing spree? I believe that he did not set these accounts up since it appears to be a rush job indicating a possible fake profile! Is this a set up? If he did carry out the mass murder, he may have been under mind control perhaps working for a Federal agency or an European equivalent Something is fishy about his facebook profile. What do you folks think? See More
Some good thought s to think about.
Insanity NEVER makes sense. People like Jared Laughner and the Unibomber and this Norwegian guy are so disconnected from reality. Go hang out with a schizophrenic or a psychotic person for a while. One cannot link the crazy behaviour to an ideology or belief system. Normal people look for reasons why this happened. Mental illness is an LSD trip in hell. If the media wishes to link this mans behaviour with Christianity or conservative beliefs they are in total denial.
People will eventually forget the details of the event, but they will remember the association — first impressions count.
Unless Norway has already fallen, the tactics employed by Breivik seem more suited to an anarchist, terrorist, or lunatic. It is also a wonder that he would target children. I cannot recall when "right-wingers" specifically targeted the young. Maybe Norway's right cannot be defined or understood by American principles.
In the meantime, I'll wait for a motive to be established. His actions do not serve the interests of anyone working to conserve or establish a system. It will alienate most people who will be incapable of condoning his actions, but may otherwise sympathize with his underlying sentiment.
The Thrid Terrorist!
Anybody notice the Muzzies were very quick to identify themselves with the shooting and bombing? (Or, at least, the bombing…)
Sudden Jihadi Syndrome? Sleeper? Bat-shiite crazy person? Something else?
Let's wait and see. Chances are the information is going to be closely held and/or classified.
Well, this story is beginning to make some sense. The first picture looked strange because it was a highly photoshoped professional portrait, but that was nothing sinister; just cleaned up blemishes, brighted the eyes like they do (overdo) with all pictures these days.
The Facebook page where it claimed he was a Christian conservative probably was a fake. I suspect it was a liberal trying to further the narrative. It has been deleted.
And it is coming out that he is a "right-winger," not in the conservative sense, but in the lefty sense–he is a Nazi. I was sensing some sort of cover-up, but it is looking like a typical media conspiracy. Nothing new.
Lost in translation. In other countries Labour is Liberal (Democrat) and Liberal is Conservative (Republican). When they talk about far right, it is referring to Labour/Liberal/Democrat, of which both Nazism and Communism can be found.
In general, I have little doubt about the "official" narrative. He may have set up the web pages as a last-minute manifesto/memorial to himself (he may have expected not to survive the incident.) On other hand, some of the statements do seem oddly self-incriminatory: the business about his girlfriend snooping around and I hope she doesn't figure this out before I can act, etc.
Sadly, unless VERY significant contrary evidence comes to light (doubtful even if discovered), we, as conservatives and opponents of the "Stealth Jihad," are going to be saddled with this for a long time.
This rotten bastard has probably done greater damage, possibly irreparable, to the "cause" he purportedly championed than any leftard could have hoped to do in the wettest of their wet dreams.