Planned Parenthood must be in a mild state of panic because they’re spending two hundred thousand big ones on ads to stop the Senate from cutting off their federal funding….
Jim Geraghty, a writer at the conservative National Review publication, responds to the new ad: “You know, folks, if you can afford to spend $200,000 on television ads, maybe you don’t need all of that federal funding.”
And the ad closes with cancer-survivor Carolyn Smithers saying if not for Planned Parenthood, she wouldn’t be here today. I guess she truly is one of the lucky ones.
Riddle me this, Batman. If they’re Planned Parenthood why are they doing breast cancer exams and general medical clinic type procedures. Not to minimize Ms. Smithers’ struggle with cancer, but what about a… oh I dunno… a doctor?
They make themselves out to be this bastion of health provision and the only option wherever their offices are. Seems to me there are usually quite a number of clinics, hospitals, and doctors around; maybe I just don’t know their particular neighborhoods, I’m willing to be corrected.
Agree with PB-in-AL!!
Also, have you seen the “Planned Parenthood’s Bunnies” commercial? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpuDbY3xU20&feature=player_embedded — Powerful reminder of what PP is really all about!
WOW! Well, there you have it. PP in a nutshell.
I’m with you both! BTW…how many babies can be murdered with 200 grand?
Eric Holder in car 54; where are you?
This is a paid ad by a political action committee financed by planned parenthood who receives federal funds and might be prosecuted under part (b) in Federal Criminal law below:
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 29 > § 603 Making political contributions
(a) It shall be unlawful for an officer or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof, or a person receiving any salary or compensation for services from money derived from the Treasury of the United States, to make any contribution within the meaning of section 301(8) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to any other such officer, employee or person or to any Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress, if the person receiving such contribution is the employer or employing authority of the person making the contribution. Any person who violates this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) For purposes of this section, a contribution to an authorized committee as defined in section 302(e)(1) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 shall be considered a contribution to the individual who has authorized such committee.
If you think the JustUs Department is going to do anything about this, Tallyman, think again.
Man, more than ever we need to get this Cancer out of office…
Igor
Igor My faith in Eric Holder is exceeded only by my trust for his boss. The law was presented as information concerning criminal activity and to illustrate the willful malfeasance of Holder.
Left-wing ideologues manifest a progressive distaste for voluntary exploitation. It should not be surprising that they prefer someone else to pay for the distribution of their dogma, and the sacrifice of virginal human life in compliance with their basic doctrines. It must be something in their faith.