Bonehead Of The Day

The leftist media can’t seem to stop insisting any challenge to their black president cannot be challenged without that challenge being deemed racist, and are seemingly more hypersensitive than the Los Angeles NAACP….

The Republican Party is saying that the President of the United States has bosses, that the union bosses this President around, the unions boss him around. Does that sound to you like they are trying to consciously or subconsciously deliver the racist message that, of course, of course a black man can’t be the real boss?
Lawrence O’Donnell, Last Word, 2/25/11

One could argue that when the gay lobby felt neglected and started making demands on Barack Obama, he later succumbed to the demands of his bosses, or when the left demanded we all get universal health care (despite the will of The People) Obama listened to those bosses.

If they’re going to see race in every word, they’ll surely have to be careful on whom they expect to be getting their coffee. See how this works…?

This entry was posted in Media Bias, Politics, Race and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Bonehead Of The Day

  1. Chris says:

    I didn’t know slavery was racist. The MSM forgets that slavery still exists in many parts of the world and the dirty little secret is that some black Africans enslave non-blacks.

    • n.n says:

      Long before the Europeans arrived in Africa, even before the arrival of Arabs and Muslims, there was slavery among the African nations and tribes (not unlike its occurrence throughout the Americas among the native empires, nations, and tribes). I believe it was with the arrival of the Arabs and Muslims, that slavery was expanded to become a market and economic enterprise. If it was not established outright, then dependence on an elite class ensured its progressive creation.

      Anyway, my point is that slavery has existed, and continues to exist. Before the Europeans participated in the African slave market, they were enslaving each other. The consideration for who was enslaved, or not, is one of association and capacity to resist involuntary servitude. The enslavement of individuals who are unlike the slaver class, was only incidental to its realization, and was largely about domination and utility, not necessarily in that order.

      The socialists claim that they can end the cycle of domination. What they fail to realize, or are incapable of admitting, is that one elite class will replace another, and the corruption, even if temporarily mitigated, will inevitably recur. This is the natural order, and it always takes precedence over the enlightened order.

      The only known system, which offers any semblance of respecting individual dignity, is a democratic republic, with a constitution to enable (it must enforced) respect for our individual rights. It’s unfortunate that our Constitution continues to be subverted, since it provides a remarkable framework to guide the establishment and maintenance of an enlightened order. It is only through the efforts of competing interests, who do not necessarily share the same interests, that the common people stand a chance — short of a violent revolution — of living their lives as semi-autonomous individuals.

      The socialists do not offer a solution, only an ideal, which continues to be demonstrated as unrealistic and ineffective. It is the natural order for progressive corruption to grow among a people, especially in a society which is distinctly heterogeneous. This is one of the principal problems affecting our society. That there has been a large influx of people, from all over the world, who do not share our culture, and are actually more interested in reconstructing the society which they left. It is not only their failure to assimilate, but their active effort to subvert the society which they have chosen (?) to live in.

      The socialist are masters of fomenting discontent and proliferating division among a people. The American left’s use of race is not unique, and their decision to exploit race easily identifiable by its incidental features is not innovative, not even progressive. However, that people have willingly submitted to a tyranny by a minority, is unusual. Typically, submission occurs through indoctrination or through violent revolutions. The former rarely happens on a large scale, and is usually enforced through acts of terror.

      O’Donnell must be desperate, if he is, once again, resuming the contemporary progressive chant of racism. While emotional appeals and acts of shaming are highly effective under normal circumstances, that is in a politically stable and economically prosperous society, we are not living in normal times, and people have had more than enough of these primitive attempts to control them.

      It’s funny that O’Donnell just recently joked about liberals and progressives playing their semantic games. And now, he is resorting to playing one of America left’s favorite game. I suppose this means that the so-called “socialists” are still unwilling to discuss issues on merit. They will continue to ally themselves with other left-wing groups, including the liberals and progressives. That’s unfortunate, because there is a conversation which should take place; but, as long as they play their games, and protect the interests of their elites, then nothing will change, and is likely to deteriorate further.

      This reminds of a show on PBS I noticed yesterday. The “teachers” were discussing “hate crimes” with the children. They left-wing lunatics are obsessed with racism, bigotry, and pronouncement of all kinds of phobias. They absolutely adore denigrating individual dignity. It is not enough for them to promote respect for others.

      Speaking of left-wing lunacy, I wonder if the “hate crimes” include provisions for mocking people who deny their true nature. Does it include provisions for mocking the secular faith? Does it include provisions for criticizing the contemporary flat-Earth consensus? Does it include provisions for recoiling in horror upon recognizing that the secular cult promotes devaluation of human life and denigration of individual dignity?

      Here’s the last word: regressive.

  2. Tallyman says:

    Racism is rampant at MSNBC: Who’s the real boss at MSNBC? Is Obama the boss of his News outlet’s stooges, or is some more intelligent White Pig, the brains behind the Obama puffery? Do Obama’s White Over-lords and Paymasters, Soros, Stein and Trumka grind their organs, while Obama dances to their tunes? It’s time for Obama to produce his school records and confirm he’s really intelligent and not an affirmative action trained dolt/drone/puppet dancing to the beat of his White Masters, Soros, Stein and Trumka.

    • Igor says:

      I do believe Stephen Krusier calls PMSNBC the “All White Network”…

      Yep. Last time I looked, still White. Still clueless. Still Race-baiting.

      Insanity, definition of.

      Igor

  3. FIREMALLNDC says:

    This is partly why I wrote my little book. http://www.growingupcolorless.com Until we can get the media message of racial unrest, historical blame and victimization out of our childrens range of influence we will never be able to deal with the very real economic issues that are presently destroying this Nation.

  4. IT Nerd says:

    Yet they had no problem saying GWB reported to the oil bosses.

  5. Nicolas says:

    “See how this works…?”

    indeed. I appreciate the clarity. definitely helps me understand better

Leave a Reply