Bonehead Of The Weekend
Immediately following a Fox News Channel year-in-review segment, Washington DC’s Fox affiliate’s weekend anchor Maureen Umeh reminded her Saturday night audience that there were other things that happened during 2009 that Shep Smith left out. Maureen Umeh asked viewers not to forget the “teabaggers”.
Teabag
To dunk ones scrotum into the open mouth of another person.
— Urban Dictionary
I don’t know her so I can’t be sure, but something tells me Maureen Umeh is one of those who voted for Obama because he’s black, is a Democrat, and holds in disdain those who had the nerve to protest against his policies last fall. I’ll stop short with awarding her our Bonehead recognition because she comes off as one of those potentially oversensitive types who yet feels it’s okay to issue an obscene gay slur to half of her audience.
December 27th, 2009 at 7:57 am
Or, she’s just another airhead who learned the term by staring at the TV and has no clue about the rest…
December 27th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
that’s fucking stupid..since when does FOX of all news stations call US “teabaggers”…come ON
December 27th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Affiliates are independent animals all to themselves.
December 27th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
Yes, the “teabagger” slur is an obscenity … but it *also* shows that “liberals” (and leftists) are afraid of us, that they view and fear us as being dominant and themselves as being submissive.
December 27th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
… for, if we are “teabaggers” are not they “teabaggies?”
December 27th, 2009 at 8:34 pm
Ilion:
I did not consider that.
The liberals/progressives are using a metaphor to reveal their feelings of inferiority and weakness. So, they’re not insulting the conservatives. No, quite the contrary. They are proclaiming submission to their superiors.
Excellent insight, Dr. Ilion. As they continue to reveal their true nature, and with further analyses, we may, one day, crack this nut, and emancipate the regressives from their self-imposed asylum.
So, now we know. We are dealing with psychotics, likely resulting from sabotaged character development, resulting in an inferiority complex. That explains their child-like behavior and their need to rebel. They will, by necessity, act and say the opposite of an evolved human being. Thus establishing their seemingly erratic, inconsistent behaviors.
It explains why rational people cannot relate to the lunatics.
December 27th, 2009 at 9:51 pm
A followup on my earlier comment.
Now that we understand the origin of the liberal/progressive, we need to focus our attention on the “elites”, the regressives’ mortal gods.
Who are they?
What is their motivation?
Why do they seek to enslave humanity?
Is it simply about massaging their ego? This may well be. I would imagine that fawning dependents would be less than fulfilling to the egomaniacs. Is there any greater achievement than to dominate and control a sentient human being that defies an imposed tyranny? A challenge unlike any other.
December 28th, 2009 at 11:12 am
As I have heard, didn’t these groups earlier self-identified themselves with this term… until they found out one of its meanings?
“It explains why rational people cannot relate to the lunatics.”…
Again, is so curious that we have grown to such a point in this nation that we start looking at the opposition as “evil”, or “lunatics” and not simply as well meaning people whose views are different then ours.
One would think that civil discourse in this nation is better than providing ammunition to our enemies.
December 28th, 2009 at 6:58 pm
One would think that civil discourse in this nation is better than providing ammunition to our enemies.
Not when they advocate for involuntary exploitation, formerly known as enslavement. Not when they litigate and legislate to curb our liberty and rights. Not when they support inequality before the law. Not when they believe in diversity of the group, rather than the individual. Not when they observe selective science, adjusting to suit their whims, and passing speculation as “theory.”
There are other reasons, but that is a good place to start.
By the way, there was no mention of “evil”. However, the “lunatic” label is perfectly applicable to anyone who meets the several criteria listed above. Some people are simply out-of-touch with reality, have limited recollection of history and present events, and are, simply stated, submissive dependants. These kind of people should not be in a position to direct others people’s lives.