A Brief History of Settled Science

The advocates of the AGW/AGCC hypothesis are the flat-worlders of olde. They are also the proponents of the hypothesis of evolution, the “big bang” hypothesis, the “Standard Model” of everything, which may soon be replaced with the hypothesis of strings, to unite the various disparate hypotheses. All these hypotheses serve a purpose, some more than others; but, the fact remains, they do not explain anything fundamental. They are what they are, useful models, tools that serve a purpose. They should be considered a means to an end, and when their utility fails, they should be replaced with something more relevant and correlated with reality.

It’s funny how many of the old religions and the faithful matured, while some deviants never accepted the scientific revolution, and many more continue to fail in comprehending its merits, and limitations. For some reason, the regressives have difficulty separating scientific and philosophical concepts. Who knows, it may be a congenital defect, or maybe they really are trapped in la-la land.

The regressives… We know them well, and now that their utility has outlived its usefulness, we wish they would evolve/progress. We hold out a welcoming hand to the regressives — the flat-worlders. Come join us in the 21st century, but forsake your mortal gods, and seek the enlightenment you so desparately need. Do not remain beholden and dependant on your “elite” masters, and reject involuntary exploitation, slavery, in any form.

Oh, and to mock the intolerant and people of prejudice…

Merry Christmas, and to all a good night!

(From a fellow traveler, enjoying the mysteries and delights of our mutual reality.)

Igor

(There are just some things pigs won’t do!)

Speaking of sentience. The concept of consciousness remains in the realm of philosophy. However, the regressives would claim they possess a unique and hidden knowledge, which enables them to determine the moment of its emergence. Funny… They don’t know what it is, but they can identify its existence.

So, how many unborn, or recently born, humans, must a regressive murder to determine the nature of life? I don’t know, but some mysteries should be left to introspection and the topic of philosophical musings.

So, the regressives do believe in charity. They also consider involuntary exploitation (i.e., slavery) to be acceptable. What a paradox. I wonder if this little inconsistency keeps them awake at night.

So, what came first, the regressive or the simian? Their hypothesis of evolution claims that it was the simian; but, the growing body of evidence would suggest otherwise. Then again, maybe the regressive is their much sought after “missing link.” They are the simian from which they claim to have evolved.

Lazy Afghanistan Army

We need to send the liberals and progressives to the front lines. They enjoy creating and exploiting “children.” Afghanistan would be their utopia, where they will be surrounded by their own kind, the entitled and incompetent.