Comments on: Email Of The Day http://www.black-and-right.com/2009/12/23/email-of-the-day-20/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:35:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: girzwald http://www.black-and-right.com/2009/12/23/email-of-the-day-20/comment-page-1/#comment-40881 girzwald Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:27:21 +0000 http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=31521#comment-40881 I doubt moveon shed 1 tear when someone broke into sarah palins e-mail. I doubt moveon shed 1 tear when someone broke into sarah palins e-mail.

]]> By: Ike http://www.black-and-right.com/2009/12/23/email-of-the-day-20/comment-page-1/#comment-40873 Ike Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:24:08 +0000 http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=31521#comment-40873 There are two kinds of people who subscribe to MoveOn emails: Those who believe everything that MoveOn says, to the point of ignoring any motive, contradiction or logic. And those who monitor what MoveOn says, who can't believe the degree to which millions of individuals have outsourced their ability to think for themselves. They will never come back, unless someone hacks the MoveOn list and inundates the masses with "The Cake is a Lie." There are two kinds of people who subscribe to MoveOn emails:

Those who believe everything that MoveOn says, to the point of ignoring any motive, contradiction or logic.

And those who monitor what MoveOn says, who can’t believe the degree to which millions of individuals have outsourced their ability to think for themselves.

They will never come back, unless someone hacks the MoveOn list and inundates the masses with “The Cake is a Lie.”

]]> By: Igor http://www.black-and-right.com/2009/12/23/email-of-the-day-20/comment-page-1/#comment-40869 Igor Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:08:10 +0000 http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=31521#comment-40869 Saw the e-mails, saw the code (yes, I'm a programmer among oter things...) Very, VERY blatant, one has to be in extreme denial to call it otherwise for what it is -"massaging" the data! So, who DID do the "hacking" into their servers? Or, perhaps, was it a whistleblower? In my Righty, Conservative mind, whomever did the deed was a whistleblower, NOT a hacker. To a Lefty... Yep, Bob, "name names". Anything else is blowing smoke up our... posteriors. Igor Saw the e-mails, saw the code (yes, I’m a programmer among oter things…) Very, VERY blatant, one has to be in extreme denial to call it otherwise for what it is -”massaging” the data!

So, who DID do the “hacking” into their servers? Or, perhaps, was it a whistleblower? In my Righty, Conservative mind, whomever did the deed was a whistleblower, NOT a hacker. To a Lefty…

Yep, Bob, “name names”. Anything else is blowing smoke up our… posteriors.

Igor

]]> By: Uncle Rick http://www.black-and-right.com/2009/12/23/email-of-the-day-20/comment-page-1/#comment-40864 Uncle Rick Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:51:19 +0000 http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=31521#comment-40864 '. . . a few words out of context. . .' Hoo boy! If you have read any of those 'few words' you will know the context. 'The data are surely wrong.' Meaning: 'The actual data don't agree with my theory. Who is Nature to challenge my intellect?' Have you seen the actual source code for the modeling program? It adds numbers which will force the graph to go up, starting in the late 20th century, making it resemble -- you guessed it -- a hockey stick. Christopher Monckton discovered that it doesn't matter what data you put into the model; it forces them all to make a hockey stick graph. Out of context, indeed. ‘. . . a few words out of context. . .’

Hoo boy! If you have read any of those ‘few words’ you will know the context.

‘The data are surely wrong.’ Meaning: ‘The actual data don’t agree with my theory. Who is Nature to challenge my intellect?’

Have you seen the actual source code for the modeling program? It adds numbers which will force the graph to go up, starting in the late 20th century, making it resemble — you guessed it — a hockey stick. Christopher Monckton discovered that it doesn’t matter what data you put into the model; it forces them all to make a hockey stick graph.

Out of context, indeed.

]]>