Boneheads Of The Day
When you spend your time exposing ACORN for padding numbers, simple math should be very easy…

Fox producer: no error in graphic; Media Matters responds
This morning, Media Matters called attention to a questionable graphic from last Friday’s Fox & Friends, and several media sites latched on to what appeared to be an error. However, the network sees it another way.Lauren Petterson, executive producer of Fox & Friends, told POLITICO that she sees no error in the graphic. And for that reason, there will be no reprimand of staff under the “zero tolerance” policy.
Wow, this is the first time I’ve ever seen percentages that didn’t have to add up to 100.
Way too many blondes at Fox News.












December 17th, 2009 at 8:22 am
Wait, who says this? 120 % of the people, and 193%? I watch Fox and they never do that crap. ANd 193 %? Where’d this supposed discussion come from? Lame Stream TV and Think (Block) Progress?? They have their heads so far up their behinds they don’t know what end is up anymore.
December 17th, 2009 at 9:42 am
Somehow, the 20% pad is still way better than the crap and lies that The Goracle and his minions are spewing…
December 17th, 2009 at 9:57 am
This is what happens when we teach our kids global warming instead of math.
December 17th, 2009 at 10:26 am
So the math is dodgy – it’s not any more dodgy than the IPCC’s math…
To misquote a famous and oft-used phrase:
“To err is human. To forgive is not Liberal policy…”
Igor
December 17th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
“Wow, this is the first time I’ve ever seen percentages that didn’t have to add up to 100.
Way too many blondes at Fox News.”
that must mean they polled some twice or so..damn it the numbers are frustrating here
December 17th, 2009 at 9:36 pm
damn.
Maybe, MAYBE if it added up to 105% they coulda claimed 5% margin of error or something. But 20%? damn
December 18th, 2009 at 1:27 am
Maybe Very is just a portion of Somewhat.
December 18th, 2009 at 12:48 pm
If they polled Democrats, its totally possible to have 120%. Look at all of the votes they magically seem to find in close elections.
December 18th, 2009 at 10:03 pm
Right on, Doo. It’s like a voting district with 2,000 people that comes up with 6,000 votes. Happens in democrat strongholds all the time…it’s probably not even fuzzy math to them.
December 18th, 2009 at 10:04 pm
Way too many blondes at Fox News.
Don’t let Tiger find out about all those blondes. I’ll gladly take Courtney Friel off their hands.