6 Responses to “Open Thread: Chaz Is Now “One Of The Boys””

1. Uncle Rick Says:
   November 19th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

   Anyone interested in the science of biology as it pertains to human sexuality needs to read Brain Sex. In a nutshell:

   Our bodies are determined by genes: two X genes equal female equipment, XY equals male equipment. Our brains, however, develop into either male or female brains (yes, Virginia, there is a difference, and it’s quite detectable) based on the hormones they receive during in utero development.

   In other animals this development continues for a while after birth, but in humans, it is all fixed by then. The brain is female by default. If the fetus is a male, it is supposed to get dosed with testosterone during pregnancy, and this re-wires the brain as a male. If, for any reason (severe stress is one; drug or hormone therapy is another), the mother doesn’t produce enough testosterone, it is entirely possible that a baby could come out with a female brain in a male body. I don’t really think that this accounts for very many homosexuals. Most really aren’t female in any meaningful way; they are men in all respects except the object of their sexual desire.

   However, for the opposite to happen, the fetus must somehow get dosed with testosterone even though it is a female. Not sure how that can happen.

   Ask Cher, I suppose. Maybe she knows.

2. n.n Says:
   November 19th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

   I can’t help but wonder how sexual reproduction came to being. Did humans reproduce asexually at one time? There must have been a stage, preceding the introduction of the recessive male, where self-fertilization occurred. Yes, if I massage this long enough, I can, in fact, discover a pattern to fit the speculation. In the modern world of selective science that is good enough.

   Whether it is a choice or biological in origin, it is a deviant behavior. However, unlike murder, rape, pedophilia, etc., it does not pose a direct threat to humanity. For that reason, society should tolerate those people, but it should never be normalized. The regressives’ predilection for selective diversity is incompatible with natural diversity.

3. Syble Says:
   November 19th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

   Doesn’t look much better as a male than as a female.

4. Nicolas Says:
   November 19th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

   and IT [chaz] says “gender is not between your legs”

   BULLSHIT! that’s just one of MANY things that determine gender..come the FUCK ON!!!

5. Hoss Says:
   November 19th, 2009 at 10:44 pm

   Dude should have broke off some gastric bypass when she/he was going under the knife.

6. n.n Says:
   November 19th, 2009 at 11:59 pm

   Uncle Rick:

   How do they explain the different levels of testosterone present during the formation of the female vs male brain? Does the female brain form when the mother is subject to extreme duress? Does the sex of the fetus affect the testosterone level in the mother, as in a feedback mechanism? Also, are there fundamental differences in the brain structure or in expression of certain features?

   This is interesting information, but it doesn’t change nature’s standard of normality. The natural norm is determined by what enables a species’ longevity. Maybe homosexual behavior, while not productive in the procreative sense, permitted individuals of the same sex to endear themselves to each other. If that’s true, then these individuals are simply primitive, undeveloped social outcasts of the human species. The modern human does not need to resort to carnal activities in order to establish mutually beneficial relationships.

   It’s an intriguing topic. Something that will keep the “pattern matchers” and evolutionists occupied for the foreseeable future.