In MA, Accept Gay Marriage Or Lose Your Job
Gays demand tolerance and inclusion.
See how long that lasts once should they continue to get people fired because they dare not agree with their brand of “marriage”….
A Massachusetts man was fired from a national retail corporation because of his traditional beliefs on same-sex marriage. Peter Vadala was formally dismissed from his job as second deputy manager of the Brookstone store at Boston’s Logan Airport on August 12, 2009, after a supervisor reported him to Human Resources regarding an incident two days earlier.
Peter has since found another job in the retail field. But it was nevertheless a horrible and frightening experience. But this is a chilling example of what can and will happen to people when same-sex “marriage” is imposed on society. What happened to Peter is exactly what was intended by the homosexual movement –– imposing a forced normalization (and even celebration) of homosexual behavior under threat of losing one’s job and livelihood.
People don’t take well to losing their jobs based on a personal belief (which IS still legal in Massachusetts, at least for now), and if the gay community decides to continue on this payback mode, they may not like the pushback they’re inspiring.
h/t Mass Resistance
November 1st, 2009 at 7:06 pm
well, any bets on which job he’d be working at if he was muslim?
November 1st, 2009 at 7:20 pm
I wonder what would have happened if this guy was muslim. How would the media react to that? “Well, the offended guy is gay….so we have to agree with him……but the offender is muslim, and we cant paint them as hateful……………………..”
Unstoppable force meets the immovable object?
*Heads explode*
We can dream cant we?
November 1st, 2009 at 7:45 pm
I am generally opposed to litigation, but it does have its place. It’s time to break out the lawyers.
November 1st, 2009 at 7:47 pm
Time to teach these people that tolerance is a two-way street.
November 1st, 2009 at 10:09 pm
When will people finally recognize who legislates and litigates their rights away. Can I disagree with the deviant homosexual behavior on the grounds that it perverts the natural order? Surely the regressives will bow to the almighty nature, and its follower, science, right? Oh, that’s right, the sexual nature of our species is superfluous, now that scientists are able to coax an egg and sperm to couple outside the womb. My mistake. I wonder what repercussions that will have once genetic diversity becomes selective diversity… I wonder.
November 1st, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Oh, one more comment. The regressives will blow a gasket, once they recognize who constitutes the opposition to this particular agenda. I wonder who will win in a competition between “protected classes”.
November 2nd, 2009 at 2:02 pm
We have Prop 71 here in Washington State that is “the camels’ nose under the tent flap” as regards to Gay Rights… and this sort of thing that is happening in Mass. has been pointed out as a prime example of being unable to speak up against it once Prop 71 is enacted if approved.
The Legislature tried to shove it down our throats and we put it to the referendum process. I hope the Wash. voters buy a clue… but who knows *what* the Seattle crazies think…
Sigh.
Igor