Al Gore refuses to debate anyone who doesn’t believe in man-made global warming. Barack Obama is proceeding on the premise that there is “consensus” among scientists and the evidence points to climate change caused by our bad behavior that may doom the next generation.
However their notion of “consensus” is a lie, and if global warming/climate change is indeed happening, why the need to lie…?
Observations of the Sun show that as for the increase in temperature, carbon dioxide is “not guilty” and as for what lies ahead in the upcoming decades, it is not catastrophic warming, but a global, and very prolonged, temperature drop. Over the past decade, global temperature on the Earth has not increased; global warming has ceased, and already there are signs of the future deep temperature drop.
— Habibullo Abdussamatov, Dr. Sc. – Head of Space research laboratory of the Pulkovo Observatory, Head of the Russian/Ukrainian joint project Astrometria
BTW — Dr. Abdussamatov is one of my favorite climate change skeptics.
So let’s send some little kids to bed crying tonight, right Al?
But wait, there’s more! (2009 U.S. Senate Report of More Than 700 Dissenting Scientists Over Man-Made Global Warming) start around page 70….
I think that climatic changes have a natural causes according many geological data… I am very glad to sign the U.S. Senate’s report of scientists against the theory of man-made global warming.
— Geology Professor Uberto Crescenti of the University G.d’Annunzio in Italy is the past president of the Society of Italian Geologists.I am appalled at the state of discord in the field of climate science…There is no observational evidence that the addition of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have caused any temperature perturbations in the atmosphere.
— Award-winning atmospheric scientist Dr. George T. Wolff, former member of the EPA’s Science Advisory Board, served on a committee of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and authored more than 90 peer-reviewed studies.The sky is not burning, and to claim that it is amounts to journalistic malpractice… the press only promotes the global warming alarmists and ignores or minimizes those of us who are skeptical.
— Chemist Dr. Mark L. Campbell, a professor of chemistry at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, MD, who has published numerous studies in the Journal of the American Chemical Society on topics such as methane.Once again we have misleading climate change pronouncements being based on data errors, data errors detected by non-UN, non-IPCC, non-peer-reviewed external observers…This is exactly what happens when you base your arguments on ‘consensus science’ and not scientific fact.
— Professor Dr. Doug L. Hoffman, a mathematician, computer programmer, and engineer, who worked on environmental models and conducted research in molecular dynamics simulations. Hoffman co-authored the 2009 book, The Resilient Earth, described as “bringing a dose of skeptical reality to climate science and the global warming debate.”The questions are scientific, but the UN answers are political. The global warming debate is hardly about science.
— Computer Modeler and Engineer Allen Simmons, who worked 12 years with NASA’s top climate scientists and wrote computer systems software for the world’s first weather satellites and aided in the development of computer systems for polar orbiting satellites. Simmons co-authored the new skeptical book The Resilient Earth.I believe the anthropogenic (man-made) effect for climate change is still only one of the hypotheses to explain the variability of climate.
— Award-winning Japanese Physicist Dr. Kanya Kusano, program director of the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology whose research “focuses on the immaturity of simulation work cited in support of the theory of anthropogenic climate change.” compared climate models to “ancient astrology.”The recent ‘panic’ to control GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions and billions of dollars being dedicated for the task has me deeply concerned that US, and other countries are spending precious global funds to stop global warming, when it is primarily being driven by natural forcing mechanisms.
— Climatologist and Paloeclimate researcher Dr. Diane Douglas, who has authored or edited over 200 technical reports, specialized in the reconstruction of a variety of proxy data and has worked for the Department of Energy and conducted research for the Arizona State Office of Climatology to investigate the Little Ice Age.Temperature measurements show that the [climate model-predicted mid-troposphere] hot zone is non-existent. This is more than sufficient to invalidate global climate models and projections made with them!
— UN IPCC Scientist Dr. Steven M. Japar, a PhD atmospheric chemist who was part of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Second (1995) and Third (2001) Assessment Reports, and has authored 83 peer-reviewed publications and in the areas of climate change, atmospheric chemistry, air pollutions and vehicle emissions.The cause of these global changes is fundamentally due to the Sun and its effect on the Earth as it moves about in its orbit. Not from man-made activities.
— Retired Award Winning NASA Atmospheric Scientist Dr. William W. Vaughan, recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Medal, a former Division Chief of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and author more than 100 refereed journal articles, monographs, and papers.Unfortunately, Climate Science has become Political Science… It is tragic that some perhaps well-meaning but politically motivated scientists who should know better have whipped up a global frenzy about a phenomena which is statistically questionable at best.
— Award-Winning Princeton University Physicist Dr. Robert H. Austin, who has published 170 scientific papers, was elected a member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and is the current Chair of the U.S. Liaison Committee of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics. Austin, who won the 2005 Edgar Lilienfeld Prize of the American Physical SocietyIf global cooling will come soon — scientists will lose trust .
— Award-winning Japanese Geologist Dr. Shigenori Maruyama, a professor at the Tokyo Institute of Technology’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences who has authored more than 125 scientific publications, was decorated with the Medal of Honor with Purple Ribbon for a major contribution in the field of geology, specializes in the geological evidence of prehistoric climate change.Observe which side resorts to the most vociferous name-calling and you are likely to have identified the side with the weaker argument and they know it.
— Materials and Research Physicist Dr. Charles R. Anderson, a former Department of Navy research physicist who has published more than 25 scientific papers specializes in spectroscopy, microscopy, thermal analysis, mass spectroscopy, and surface chemistry.The data which is used to date for making the conclusions and predictions on global warming are so rough and primitive, compared to what’s needed, and so unreliable that they are not even worth mentioning by respectful scientists.
— Award-winning Aerospace and Mechanical Engineer Dr. Gregory W. Moore, who has authored or co-authored more than 75 publications, book chapters, and reports, and authored the 2001 Version of the NASA Space Science Technology Plan which included a comprehensive approach to studying the Sun-Earth connection aspect of space-based research.I appreciate the opportunity to add my name to those who disagree that global warming is man-made… Hansen embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming.
— Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist Dr. John S. Theon, a former supervisor of NASA’s James Hansen, and the former Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA Headquarters and former Chief of the Atmospheric Dynamics & Radiation Branch.I am pleased to be considered a ‘denier’ in this cause if this puts me in the class with those who defied prevailing ‘scientific consensus’ that the earth was flat and that the earth was the not the center of the universe.
— Retired U.S. Air Force (USAF) Meteorologist William “Bill” Lyons, of the USAF’s Global Weather Central at Strategic Air Command.I do not find the supposed scientific consensus among my colleagues… Curiously, it is a feature of man-made global warming that every fact confirms it: rising temperatures or decreasing temperatures. No matter what the weather, some model of global warming offers a watertight explanation.
— Earth Scientist Dr. Javier Cuadros of the UK Natural History Museum, who specializes in Clay Mineralogy and has published more than 30 scientific papersIt is amazing to me, as a professional geologist, how many otherwise intelligent people have, as some may say, ‘drunk the Al Gore Kool-Aid’ concerning global climate change.
— Professional Geologist Earl F. Titcomb Jr. has co-authored analyses of geological and seismological hazards.Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus [which] is the business of politics. . . . What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.
— Atmospheric Scientist Timothy R. Minnich, who has more than 30 years experience in the design and management of a wide range of air quality investigations for industry and government, is a past member of the American Meteorological Society and specializes in issues like acid rain and ozone, and has authored or co-authored numerous technical publications and reports.Based on the laws of physics, the effect on temperature of man’s contribution to atmospheric CO2 levels is minuscule and indiscernible from the natural variability caused in large part by changes in solar energy output.
— Atmospheric Scientist Robert L. Scotto, who has more than 30 years air quality consulting experience, served as a manager for an EPA Superfund contract and is co-founder of Minnich and Scotto, Inc., a full-service air quality consulting firm. He also is a past member of the American Meteorological Society (AMS). Scotto, a meteorologist who has authored or co-authored numerous technical publications and reports.Whether the ice caps melt, or expand — whatever happens — the AGW (anthropogenic global warming) theorists claim it confirms their theory. A perfect example of a pseudo-science like astrology.
— Mathematical Physicist Dr. Frank Tipler, professor at Tulane University has authored 58 peer-reviewed publications and five books.My dear colleague (NASA’s James) Hansen, I believe, has finally gone off the deep end… The global warming ‘time bomb,’ ‘disastrous climate changes that spiral dynamically out of humanity’s control.’ These are the words of an apocalyptic prophet, not a rational scientist.
— Chemist Dr. Nicholas Drapela of the faculty of Oregon State University Chemistry DepartmentThere is no credible evidence of the current exceptional global warming trumpeted by the IPCC…The IPCC is no longer behaving as an investigative scientific organization or pretending to be one…Their leaders betrayed the trust of the world community.
— Chemist Dr. Grant Miles, author of numerous scientific publications who was elected to a Fellowship of the Royal Institute of Chemistry, was a member of UK Atomic Energy Authority Chemical Separation Plant Committee.
Why is it that I’m told I should listen to these people and not believe the pronouncements of Al Gore, Barack Obama, and those who scare children and adults alike just to manipulate our behavior and turn us all into a bunch of clueless, vegan environmentalists?
Aren’t these the people who preach “choice”…?
h/t Climate Depot







OldnyFirefighter:
Typical American, thinking how to solve problems and leaving the bed covers behind. It must be good to be an adult. I am certain many “children” envy your self-motivation and initiative.
JR:
Consensus is the absence of leadership…
and in science it is a wash without evidence to support it.
Continued – required for Virginia & Northern States. My dog is on my lap again, have to remember to disable my touch pad as she is nosy, with her real nose. She posted on me again before I finished. I can’t get rid of her, she thinks I’m her daddy! We do look alike, but she is cuter & better looking.
Keith O. Rattie
Chairman, President and CEO
Questar Corporation: Energy Myths and Realities
Speech by Rattie at UVU.
Yes, he represents “Big Natural Gas”.
Yes, he is an AGW/AGCC skeptic — surprise, surprise, right?
No, he is not affiliated with “Big Green”.
And no, I do not know if he uses a teleprompter, or two.
You read. You decide.
Global cooling? Fixed that! I called Fire Dispatch Center & told them I had a “Controlled Burn”. I then lit about 160 bushels of leaves. One hellofafire! Warmed up my backside very nicely. So much for Global Cooling! The low Sun Spot activity is supposed to continue for at least another five years, but my Solar Hot Water System still gets up to 180 degrees F. in about six hours. I might even consider adding a larger storage tank & more panels to supplement my heat if oil prices continue to rise. If it works in Upstate NY even in zero degree temps. It will be terrific from S. Carolina to the Florida Keys. Oh, I almost forgot the circulating pumps involved use less electricity than a 20 watt light bulb & can be Solar Electric powered. If you are handy, you can build solar collectors for less than $150. Just one is enough for S. Carolina & South. Two or three are requ
Consensus is the absence of leadership.
-Margaret Thatcher
“Aren’t these the people who preach “choice”…?”
that’s right
love the voices of dissent there, thanks for listing them
If people are concerned about a 1-2 degree rise in average global temperature, then they should be terrified of a fall. With cooling we will require more energy to produce heat, develop agriculture, raise livestock, etc. This will be problematic for humans, animals, plants, and machines alike. A global cooling will have far more serious consequences than a global warming.
It would be in our best interest for all interests to participate in the research of the Earth system, regardless of bias, so long as the research is substantiated and supported. Continued denial of models failing to conform to reality, dismissal of contradictory physical evidence, and slandering contrary views, is not productive science, and is a disservice to the people of this world.
We will have the debate denied us. The resurgence of closed minds to scientific discovery and lack of accountability is not in our best interest. We should act to prevent a regression into a new Dark Age.
Something to consider, dependence and correlation:
Global Warming… on Mars
Now scientists at NASA’s Ames Research Centre in California have gone part of the way to explaining this change in the planet’s climate, by researching changes in dust and reflected heat from the sun.
The research shows that between the 70s and 90s, Mars warmed by point 0.65 degrees Celsius.
Here on earth the average temperature rose by point 0.75 during the 20th century.
And for the past decade the average temperature on Earth has declined, which just happens to coincide with reduced solar activity.
For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.
The sun is in the pits of the deepest solar minimum in nearly a century.
Whatever happens, notes Hathaway, “the sun is behaving in an
interesting way and I believe we’re about to learn something new.”
Just a coincidence? The Chinese, Russians, et al, don’t think so, and it is now painfully obvious that many others don’t also.
Dang, I hate it when facts and research get in the way.
You don’t have to be trained as a scientist or engineer to understand that the same gas that is supposed to be holding heat inside our atmosphere also let that heat IN. From the sun.
Gore et al have never explained the magic one-way CO2 gas phenomenon.
Follow the money, follow the money, follow the money…
Who’s making the big buck off of Carbon Offsets, grants to study AGW, etc.?
The (so-called) scientists that study Gore-bull Warming, that’s who!
Being Chicken Little never paid so well, and of course anybody that goes against the consensus suffers financially and in status.
Methinks, though, that as the globe enters another cooling period (oh, wait – we’re already there!!) the Great Unwashed Masses are going to finally wake up to the hoax and beat the AGW hucksters to death with an icicle.
One can hope.
Igor
My favorite quote: ‘disastrous climate changes that spiral dynamically out of humanity’s control.’
So we’re currently in control of the climate?!? If that’s so, how can I make it stop raining on my yard? I don’t want to mow anymore this year. Oh, right, we can’t do that.