C’mon, what’s the problem? MSNBC’s Norah O’Donnell doesn’t see a problem.
Jeez, it’s not like they’re singing about Bush…
-
-
Buy this e-book from this Nationwide Concealed Carry ad and the publisher will make a donation to Black & Right
-
My oldest, now on iTunes
Far be it for a problem to arise from singing about dear leader
seriously, Bob, I’m happy you got job that associates with NewsBusters. Good times. I love how they expose this kind of garbage in the Liberal MSM
What does “equal pay for equal work” have to do with Obama? Oh, that’s right. It’s all about consolidation of power. The government, and the queen, Obama, controlling, and guiding, the hapless masses.
Why did the so-called “journalist” leave out “Barack Hussein Obama” from the transcript?
I think O’Donnell would probably prefer this little chant:
We pledge allegiance to Barack Hussein Obama,
and to the “elites” for which he stands, one hive under
Atheism, liberal, progressive and enslavement of all.
It has a nice ring to it. Don’t you think?
Stalin, Hitler, Jong-il, the whole bunch of them, stand in awe and admiration. Aside from the mass deaths, those leaders would be impressed by America’s fawning liberals/progressives, and the so-called “journalists.”
Well, at least she’s pretty. She has that going for her.
This is why we left the CCCP? Only to arrive in the USSA.
Round and round we go, with no progress to show.
One more observation:
O’Donnell must be a follower of the new religion of atheism, which believes in praying, and bowing, to its leaders.
News flash, atheists and faux-agnostics, this has been done before. Why don’t you just anoint him as your emperor, and be done with it.
If the moderates don’t get it yet, then they never will.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l46t_nrySg4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08BAfKCfu74
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVFdAJRVm94
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-0NvkuPHZI
The question no one has seemed to ask yet, is has Charisse Carney-Nunes, the author of I am Barack Obama, who has been on a book tour touting her children’s book, participated or instigated this type of thing more than once?
If it was a ‘one off’, then the school can shoulder all the blame. But if is a pattern, then it’s more than distrubing, it’s truly the beginning of the Obama Youth brigade.
If news people are so blinded by their adoration of a president who hasn’t done anything but triple the national debt and *divided* the country then they have no business in the news business.
“O’Donnell must be a follower of the new religion of atheism, which believes in praying, and bowing, to its leaders.
News flash, atheists and faux-agnostics, this has been done before. Why don’t you just anoint him as your emperor, and be done with it.
If the moderates don’t get it yet, then they never will.”
That’s pretty offensive n.n. I’m an agnostic, but would never worship a person or anoint a man as an emperor. I’m also a moderate, yet still an avid reader of this site and agree with most of what is posted here. This sort of bashing people for a label that is placed on them is part of the cause of the extreme partisanship in government right now.
countrysc,
I am too non-religious, and no longer a Republican (got out this summer, only lasted one year as a republican). Why? Because too many “religious” folks” don’t understand the constitution. If they did, they would tolerate everyone’s position on “religion” and even for those who do not practice it. Even Satanic Worship is a protrected right, but I find that the “religious right” does not tolerate many other views.
Even Newt said the party is becoming too Religious. The Republican Party should be for following the constitution exclusively, but they don’t.
Don’t get me wrong, religion is very important to the individual and a constitutional right to maintain and I would be the first to say that I want everyone who wants to have a faith to please do so. But faith should be a personal thing, not a mandate for all. All should be protected through the constitution: Agnostics to Zionist all should be free to worship or not on their personal beliefs without public ridicule.
I don’t ridicule religious thought, I encourage it. I hope one day though that the “religious right and left” will stop ridiculing the non-religious.
“Red or yellow, black or white,
they are precious in his sight.
Jesus loves the little children of the world.”
How does one NOT see the clear Messiah-parallel imagery there?
Yeah, things are SO terrible for agnostics and atheists, right?
/SARC
countrysc, Cindy:
I am an agnostic. My criticism is of the atheists who deny that their movement is a religion, while condemning other religions. My reference to faux-agnostics, is specifically to those who claim to be open-minded; but, collaborate with atheists, and are therefore actually members of the atheist religion. I would use quotes, or refer to them with “so-called,” but it becomes tedious to do so. Human beings, and their utility, science, are unable to explain any fundamental truths. Furthermore, selective adherence to scientific observation should be beneath all people who proclaim science to be the new religion.
The events we observe today are a throwback to the persecution suffered in past times. What is happening, is no different then what the atheists and faux-agnostics condemn from history. The only difference is that, this time, they are the perpetrators. They are the regressives.
Something else to consider:
By process of elimination, if the religious are singing, and praying, to their God or gods, then who worships mortal beings? Why would anyone sing the praises of another human being, other than in proclamation of the reverence they hold for this person? Is it not enough to respect other people as moral entities, and to honor the institutions which assure our rights and liberty? When the liberals/progressives understand these concepts, then they may recognize their own individual dignity and stop exploiting others to serve their whims.
“There is none so blind as he who will not see”, Norah.
(emphasis mine)
Igor