You know how liberals almost always say Republicans make stuff up? Why is it we almost always catch them fact challenged?
In a blog posting yesterday, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman raises questions about a recent Rasmussen Reports poll of Massachusetts voters. The poll shows that Bay State voters are less than enthusiastic about the state’s experiment in health care reform.
Krugman states that “last year polling seemed to show very strong support for the Massachusetts plan.” He then asks, “So has support plunged since then? Or is the wording of the Rasmussen poll calculated to give a negative result?”
Krugman must have an interesting definition of “very strong support.” The poll he cited found that just 14% want to continue the state’s health care reform program, 12% want to repeal it, and 70% want to keep it but change it.
It goes on to make ol’ Paul look even more the fool.
Anyone want to guess who’ll be the next “journalist” to jump ship for the Obama Administration?
How about Brian “The Bower” Williams?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkoEIYve2GM&feature=player_embedded
This should probably be flagged as spreading disinformation.
This reminds me of the AGCC/AGW crowd, and their inconvenient evidence. They have their “deniers,” and the “UHC (universal health care)” crowd have their “flaggers” — whoops… wrong side, but it has a nice ring to it. Although, with UHC, someone will surely be flogged, if not also flagged.
Disclaimer: This is not an attempt to hijack the thread, but acknowledgement that all of these agendas have a common basis.
Who was that “liberal”/”progressive” that informed us of “Godwin’s law”?
Should we forward this video to her?
Nanci Pelosi Says Townhall Protesters Carry Swastikas
I quick followup to my first post.
All those who do not support, or seek to subvert, the “Declaration of Independence”, the Constitution, and especially the “Bill of Rights” can now be referred to as “flaggers.”
For this inspiration, I would like to thank BS, Mike Malloy, and regressives everywhere for further distinguishing themselves from the sane and sound people throughout this world.
Bob, you always have to frame it as Paul Krugman, former Enron adviser,…”. Let’s you know his credibility is shit right from the get-go.
“former Enron adviser”
I did not know that. That explains a lot… a lot…
He didn’t have to travel far for his new job at NYT.