Is she a “progressive”?

“I am curious…”

“http://lafiga.firedoglake.com/…tea-bagging/”

No, she must be a “liberal.” Backpedaling already? This is grade school all over again.

First, they were on the defensive. Then, on the offensive. Today, once again, they are on the defensive.

The tide is turning. People realize their policies will require sacrifices, and they are not prepared to make them. Even journalists with integrity cannot deny that regressive policies have always been, and continue to be, dismal failures. This is especially true when their policies sabotage the economy, which serves the needs of human beings while they exist on Earth. Furthermore, it doesn’t help to have a large unproductive class which undermines our economy, nor a large aging population which will become a burden on the same, nor a growing illegal population who delegitimize and destabilize our society.

Is invocation of “Godwin’s Law” equivalent to that of mentioning Nazis? Just when do socialists escape their heritage in Nazi Germany, the communist CCCP, fascist Italy, imperial Japan, etc. By the way, if the fascists are “right-wing”, then the people who ascribe to conservative principles and philosophy are neither “right-wing,” and certainly not “left-wing.” History would dictate that the regressives, including their modern equivalents, the “liberals” and “progressives”, lay claim to both wings. It is unfortunate that people have either forgotten or choose to ignore the past, and, surprisingly, the present.

I thought the solution lies with the “minorities” casting of their chains and speaking out against those who would exploit them. It seems I underestimated their tactics. While whites experience progressive exploitation, discrimination, and marginalization, so too do blacks, Hispanics, and other “minorities.” This is not a “black and white” issue. It is about control, and, by definition, it is fascism, it is dictatorial. A more appropriate analogy of BS to a figure in history would be Mussolini. Although, Hitler, Stalin, et al, were just as much fascists. It is telling how easily each philosophy crosses over to the other. Does that also trigger “Godwin’s Law” (is an uncle also required)?

Does the debate end because “he won”? Does he have an unrestricted mandate with 53% support? Just how many supporters does he have? Considering that more moderates are recognizing the insanity of his, and the Democrats (and other pretenders), policies, we can assume that his support has been reduced from his original base. There is no way that anyone who did not vote for him, would support his regressive policies. So, his current approval rating hovers around 50%. That would mean that he only has support from no more than 27% of the country.

One more matter. If our “representatives” (i.e., public servants) will not, or cannot, even read the bills before them, then let the “Tea Parties” continue. Eventually, everyone will recognize and accept reality. The regressive limbo should be left in the past, along with other discarded and denounced relics which only serve to curtail progress and prevent peaceful coexistence.

We don’t need no education. We don’t need no thought control! — Pink Floyd

The “elites” can keep their residence in the “ivory towers” and leave the people with individual dignity and a superior life.

Classic Robert!!!

J.M. Lewis
SCS, Michigan
Blog: http://rougerevival.blogspot.com/

And I’m curious – why do you and others call the Tea Party attendees “teabaggers”? No doubt you’ve got a good reason. After all, we’ve all read the Huffington Post writers call gay rights activists “butt****ers”, animal rights activists “furries”, and immigrants groups “Dirty Sanchezes”.

Sucks to be you now, doesn’t it? Free Speech is good only when liberals are using it, is that the picture?

Go move to Cuba – you’ll feel right at home there.

Not a native
Never held a real job
Pretends to be an expert in fields in which he has no experience
Associates with radicals
Funded by industrialists
Created his own symbol
Strong-arm election tactics
Fraudulent voter registration
Carefully planned, highly organized and tightly orchestrated public speeches, at night with dramatic lighting, etc.
Got his own songs (see little children singing ‘em on YouTube; it’s scary)
Nebulous promises of undefined change
Consolidating power immediately
Constraint of the press

Gee. Is there a pattern, or what?

There are no similarities and that could never happen in the U.S.
My apologies.