Liberals: Museum Shooting Right Wing Hate
Something doesn’t seem right here, pardon the pun. The instantaneous, collective kneejerk from liberal pundits to blame the Holocaust Museum shooting on “right wing hate” stinks. It’s as if this is a preemptive strike to cover something that may be soon be revealed about them…
I don’t think you can deny that there is a rising climate of right wing hate, a lot of it directed at Obama. You and I go way back to the beginning of the campaign and the level of craziness. He’s a secret Muslim. He hates America. He wasn’t born here. Now this guy, Von Brunn, he’s, he, he was one of the birthers. He didn’t believe in Obama’s birth certificate and he was constantly online agitating about that.
— Joan Walsh, Salon.com, on Hardball
No wonder Walsh works for Salon. There are reports that Von Brunn was a liberal “9/11 Truther” who hated “neocons”, Bush and McCain specifically. Inconvenient truth, and I won’t waste a “bonehead” on her.
And there was this…
They absolutely need to be motivated and are being motivated. Each of these episodes in recent weeks- whether it’s the killing of an abortion doctor- whether it was this Holocaust denier today, or whether it was others- whether you’re talking about Tim McVeigh or anti-tax secessionists in Texas- the interesting thing is they’re all separate, but they’re all hearing portions of the same echo chamber, a kind of dialogue- a toxic dialogue that’s subterranean in large parts.
— Wayne Slater, Dallas Morning News, on CNN
Go to the liberal blogs and see who holds the title on death wishes for their political and ideological opponents.
And it would seem to me that if you were to add up the numbers, you would probably find the majority of vocal, public anti-semitism on college campuses, and we all know who runs them….
June 10th, 2009 at 10:14 pm
Conservatives are not pacificists. However, if history has taught us anything, they do not initate, but respond to attacks on their lives and those they care about and are responsible for. Conservatives are not bullies, but will not lay down and be exploited.
The guy who removed the abortionist from this world may have been conservative; but, it was his life he knowingly sacrificed for the justice he sought, and society denied. However, the guy at the Holocaust Museum was most certainly “liberal” or “progressive”, a remnant of the Nazis from yesteryear. He is a descendant of those regressives, and his heritage and ancestry lies with them.
These reports confirm what cannot be denied, and that is Salon and CNN are irrelevant as independent soures of news reporting. They still serve some use as diversity resources, which can be used to contrast between reality and the regressive fantasy.
The problem with the “liberal”/”progressive” versus conservative debate, is that by definition, liberal and progressive termed ideologies are so appealing to the mind seeking enlightenment. It is unfortunate that the “liberals”/”progressives” are neither liberal, nor progressive. Once again, history reflects this in conservatives being both liberal and progressive. The difference lies in the rate of progression. In most systems, and certainly in human society, progression at a fast rate will, with great likelihood, result in failure and ultimately self-destruction. There was never a human being alive, nor presently living, that can master all the variables in our system. This necessitates a conservative progression in order to minimize runaway feedback, which will ultimately undermine the system. This, in a nutshell, is the reason for success of conservative principles in the real world. Well that and we accept and live in the real world, with all its flaws and marvels.
June 11th, 2009 at 11:34 am
Anyone who decides to take the law into their own hands and maim or murder other cititizens is NOT exhibiting the true conservative standpoint at all.
June 11th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
FYI according to the MSM;
Anger + white + gun = Right wing Christian
June 13th, 2009 at 2:26 am
Dave J:
The equation may be simpler than that:
!Regressive (aka “liberal”, aka “progressive” — for they are neither) = Terrorist
This would explain why they oppose some whites, some blacks, some hispanics, et al. I am certain Bob would concur. Although,
White & !Regressive = Terrorist,
seems to be their favorite target.
Why these regressives regurgitate failed policies and theories of the past is beyond me. The policies of discrimination, intimidation, exploitation, persecution, etc., sabotage the progress we have made, and prevent progression to something altogether better.