<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worst Economy Since Hoover&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.black-and-right.com/2009/02/24/worst-economy-since-hoover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2009/02/24/worst-economy-since-hoover/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRFan</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2009/02/24/worst-economy-since-hoover/comment-page-1/#comment-26034</link>
		<dc:creator>BRFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=16876#comment-26034</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious as to why it&#039;s 93 days. That&#039;s an odd number (no pun intended).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious as to why it&#8217;s 93 days. That&#8217;s an odd number (no pun intended).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louielouie</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2009/02/24/worst-economy-since-hoover/comment-page-1/#comment-26002</link>
		<dc:creator>louielouie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=16876#comment-26002</guid>
		<description>i think showing the market drop/gain as a percentage is somewhat misleading in the table shown.
the size of the market in 1912, 1916, &amp; 1920 were no where near the size of the market in 2009.  
the shear magnitude of the wealth lost in these past 93 days is probably the same as the actual size of the entire market back then.
showing the percentages may be the best way, but it seems misleading to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think showing the market drop/gain as a percentage is somewhat misleading in the table shown.<br />
the size of the market in 1912, 1916, &amp; 1920 were no where near the size of the market in 2009.<br />
the shear magnitude of the wealth lost in these past 93 days is probably the same as the actual size of the entire market back then.<br />
showing the percentages may be the best way, but it seems misleading to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

