A 9/11 Slap In The Face
While the left may be gleeful about President Barack Obama’s decision to close Guantanamo and suspend the Military Commissions, some personally involved are making their displeasure known.
It seems the new President is too far removed from the victims of 9/11. Victims like 11-year-old Bernard Curtis Brown, a passenger on American Airlines Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon. Everyone onboard was killed, as well as [125] people in the Pentagon. Curtis was on a trip with several of his classmates to California sponsored by National Geographic.
Obama and the Democrats have had a blind spot for 9/11 and have yet to show they have an ounce of understanding what happened that day.
During his inaugural address, it sounded at times as if President Obama was scolding us “ordinary people”.
Scolding can be a two-way street.
January 26th, 2009 at 12:08 am
No, no, no, Bob. Repeat after me. There was no Bernard Curtis Brown. No plane hit the Pentagon. National Geographic never sponsored any trip to California. And 9/11 NEVER HAPPENED!
For your required viewing (along with “Incoherent Rubes”): “Loose and Deranged”.
The U.S. government is nothing more than a big film production studio perpetrating massive visual hoaxes on the American public since film began (which makes you think twice about how Hollywood fits into the whole “Bush faked 9/11″ theory).
These “9/11″ people are all just plants of the former Bush Administration and the RNC to prosecute the hoax for posterity.
Where have you been, Bob? The lunar landing, aliens at Roswell, the grassy knoll, have all transplanted the stories of the Founding Fathers as America’s Only Relevant and Officially Sanctioned History.
11 year-old Bernard Curtis Brown never existed. And even if he did, he’s just living on some Southeast Asian island under an assumed identity. Really, Bob. The truth is (re)written.
You’re reading from the wrong hymn book.
January 26th, 2009 at 12:49 am
so, when the truth comes out about Obama being in illegal alien essentially, does that mean Gitmo gets back up & running…if Gitmo is actually shut down?
January 26th, 2009 at 12:43 pm
Sorry Diss.
What was I thinkin’?