The Google-Skank Ho Suit
Two things. It’s never a good idea to call a woman a “skank” or a “ho”, and I always thought that one loses certain protections once one became a public person.
As I said, it’s never a good idea to call a woman a “skank” or a “ho”…
Liskula Cohen, 36, is seeking a court order that would force Google to reveal the person or persons behind the postings so she can hold them accountable with a defamation lawsuit.
The anonymous bloggers have “posted entries, including photographs, captions to the photographs and commentary solely about Liskula Cohen that describe her as a ’skank’ and a ‘ho,’ ” her filing in Manhattan Supreme Court says.
Cohen hopes to at least force a level playing field by exposing her tormenter.
If that’s the worse she’s been called, Ms. Cohen needs to get a life.
Welcome to my Google world, and I ain’t suing nobody. It goes with the territory, especially when dealing with their sophisticated, progressive clientele.
Then again if she wins this, I could be rich.
January 6th, 2009 at 9:11 pm
Wow! I think southsidebugsy must work for a certain senator from Nevada.
January 6th, 2009 at 10:26 pm
I am so sorry you get bombarded with that crap. You’re a strong man to put up with it like you do.
January 6th, 2009 at 10:53 pm
those racist, dumbasses on youtube…yeesh…also, those hot yet airheaded models…what can ya do?
January 6th, 2009 at 11:10 pm
She wasnt called “nappy headed” so it wasnt Don Imus.
January 7th, 2009 at 3:38 am
She’s just going to waste a bunch of money.
January 7th, 2009 at 6:41 am
On the other hand, one could always just go to court — and then prove that she is really a skank…