I found myself pacing the back porch, trying to figure out just how I was going to react to the latest New York Times-sponsored slander of Republicans and conservatives.
But the G.O.P.’s long transformation into the party of the unreasonable right, a haven for racists and reactionaries, seems likely to accelerate as a result of the impending defeat.
— Paul Krugman, 11/3/08
Those of you who frequent this site are familiar with the past of the Democrat Party, along with the present including Barack Obama’s use of the race card during the Clinton primary as well as the presidential campaign, the orchestrated illegal activities of ACORN using racial disenfranchisement as a counter, Joe Biden’s slurring of Indian-Americans, and CNN’s Rick Sanchez’ national attempt to humiliate black Republicans on-air because they won’t support Obama.
Despite the braggadocio (and not knowing if Paul Krugman had the misfortune of breeding) if his daughter pulled a “Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner” and brought a black man home, just how long would it be before Paul pulled out “shvatza”?
Maybe, before labeling the entire Republican Party as racists, he should check out the comments on this and other black conservative sites, and read the enlightened entries by tolerant, inclusive progressives who don’t hesitate to use the words “Sambo”, “sell-out” like Rick Sanchez did, “wannabe white”, and “nigger”, and use those words in numbers exponentially larger than any Republican ever has.
The Democrat Party, to this day, has successfully white-washed and still denies its racist past. By doing so, they continue to show the very revulsion of black people they claim to champion. What do you call a people who lie about, thus deny another, their history?
David Axelrod used an unqualified black man to score a gubernatorial win in Massachusetts, and took that perfected the technique to impose Obama on the nation. Deval Patrick is a lousy governor and because of his example, will probably be the last black one we’ll have here for a long time. Barack Obama will do more for race relations because once elected, black Democrats may have to reflect on their repeated stupidity in issuing their blind loyalty to Democrats who have no political benefit when raising their standards of living.
People who become independent, and start making money, usually end up becoming Republicans.
Paul Krugman is an anomaly. He’s both a race denier when it comes to Democrats and a race enabler when it comes to slandering Republicans. There is a place in hell for people like Krugman.
He may unknowingly find himself there on November 4th.







Good luck to you MTV and come home to tell us your stories.
Well Bob,
It’s that time. I’ll probably have to email you directly to stay in contact. I leave with this:
Today I was “ingame” with a liberal and when I brought up that I’m a conseravtive they threw his quote at me:
OF Equality—As if it harm’d me, giving others the same chances and rights as myself—As if it were not indispensable to my own rights that others possess the same. -Walt Whitman
So I threw back that why should ANYONE that is my equal have more rights than me? I.e. Gays, women, blacks, Asians…etc…
He logged off.
Guess that sums it up.
Take care all of you that visit this site (my brothers and sisters in the fight for our country) for I will be taking care of my troops for a bit. I wish I could stay here and perform my duties protecting our domestic people but I am needed elsewhere. It’s what I VOLUNTEERED for and what I must do. God Bless.
MTV
I’m surprised Krugman didn’t add something to the effect of Republicans being so stupid and racist that they’ve eschewed the elucidation of reason and logic provided by the NYT, and that’s the reason that pinnacle of journalism is circling the drain. Krugman’s a piece of shit.
Being called reactionary or racist doesn’t really cut too deep coming from a self-loathing Jew. Maybe a dose of Obama and his pals Jesse and Calypso Louie and the other Jew-and-Israel haters might open his eyes. But, I doubt it.
Bob, are you reading the NYT so we don’t have to?