|
--- Exclusive Black & Right Advertisers ---
Buy this e-book from this ad and the publisher will make a donation to Black & Right NFL store featuring NFL merchandise and sports memorabilia Genuine Style by DirectBuy Find the biggest selection of NBA Memorabilia here! Read the pros/cons between Starcaps and Nutrisystem reviews Hunting Knives
-
-
-
Custom Search
|
Nah, This Ain’t No Race Card13 Responses to “Nah, This Ain’t No Race Card”Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment. |
Since July '08
ArchivesCategories |
July 31st, 2008 at 6:30 pm
Can you say floundering? I knew you could!
July 31st, 2008 at 7:33 pm
“When we are in such dire straights, economically…” I’m going to raise every tax I can think of!
July 31st, 2008 at 9:39 pm
I think we can all agree no Republican would ever “play the race card.”
July 31st, 2008 at 9:52 pm
I won’t.
July 31st, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Never, ever?
July 31st, 2008 at 10:53 pm
Hey Blaine–
Show me the Republican who has played the race card ON HIMSELF!
July 31st, 2008 at 11:07 pm
Hey Blaine-
The first video had NOTHING to do with race, just character and bad policy.
The second video was about policy. Not attacking the candidate’s race.
August 1st, 2008 at 7:54 am
The naked white telling Harold to call her was proof of that.
— Lee Atwater, lead campaign adviser for Reagan and Bush I., RNC Chairman.
August 1st, 2008 at 1:07 pm
Same shit he always says. Nothing.
August 1st, 2008 at 3:44 pm
What did he say. I listen to this guy and tell my self I’m really going to pay attention. Ten minutes later I can’t tell you what he said because he said nothing of substance. Nothing memorable. Smoke and mirrors. “Change”? To what? By what method? In what amount of time?
As far as the race issue… As long as BHO and his campaign keep reminding us that he is the “first black man this or that”, is that NOT about race? And more and more, I’m beginning to think that maybe it’s not about BHO as much as it is getting a [b]black[b] man elected PSO. It could be ANY black man.
August 1st, 2008 at 7:04 pm
Blaine, since you reference FAIR, I’ll reference AIM
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/harold-fords-playboy-party
August 1st, 2008 at 8:12 pm
OK.
Got to the third sentence, strawman argument.
You call this convincing? What mistake? Going to a party? He was single and heterosexual wasn’t he? Was he going on the public’s dime? Breaking any laws? No, no, and no. So what is this mistake?
Tell me, what was the purpose of having the naked model in the ad at all if the point was to inform the public of his actions? It’s more than naive to suggest the point of the ad was the issues at hand if they had to illustrate their point with naked white women.
August 3rd, 2008 at 12:27 am
At 49 secs. he says the 8-10 years thing again. Someone has to tell him he is running for president, not prime minister.