<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Media&#8217;s AA Candidate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nor</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14780</link>
		<dc:creator>Nor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14780</guid>
		<description>Who is they? Implied where?

CNN, MSNBC, FOX, ABC and any nurmber of pundits on line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is they? Implied where?</p>
<p>CNN, MSNBC, FOX, ABC and any nurmber of pundits on line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kushin Los</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14766</link>
		<dc:creator>Kushin Los</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14766</guid>
		<description>You know what, to hell with race.

To hell with those who use race.  To hell with a great deal of things that have been said here in this particular column.  To hell with a great deal of things.

Vote (not that it confirms any actual consent) for who you want to for the reasons you want to or do not vote at all.  But if you do vote, well, to hell with you to.

I&#039;ll meet you there though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what, to hell with race.</p>
<p>To hell with those who use race.  To hell with a great deal of things that have been said here in this particular column.  To hell with a great deal of things.</p>
<p>Vote (not that it confirms any actual consent) for who you want to for the reasons you want to or do not vote at all.  But if you do vote, well, to hell with you to.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll meet you there though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaine</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14739</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14739</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;THey may not have said it but it sure as hell has been implied HEAVILY.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Who is they? Implied where?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>THey may not have said it but it sure as hell has been implied HEAVILY.</p></blockquote>
<p>Who is they? Implied where?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nor</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14738</link>
		<dc:creator>Nor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14738</guid>
		<description>I think the real point is that if someone does not support Obama, it has to be that the person is a racist, or will not support anybody but the old standard WASP.

Nobody&#039;s said anything of the sort.

THey may not have said it but it sure as hell has been implied HEAVILY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real point is that if someone does not support Obama, it has to be that the person is a racist, or will not support anybody but the old standard WASP.</p>
<p>Nobody&#8217;s said anything of the sort.</p>
<p>THey may not have said it but it sure as hell has been implied HEAVILY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14736</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14736</guid>
		<description>Personally, the constant lies, flip-flops, and his stated policies are what make him unqualified in my eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, the constant lies, flip-flops, and his stated policies are what make him unqualified in my eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaine</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14732</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14732</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Correct me if I&#039;m wrong&lt;/blockquote&gt;You are, and I will . . .

&lt;blockquote&gt;So the 43 white men were &quot;Undoubtedly qualified&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees. The point is, I will state AGAIN, is that there is an Affirmative Action program in this country for white males.

It&#039;s strictly enforced, and so far the only way to get into the Presidency.

If you want to be President, this AA program says you have to be white.

You have to be male.

And with one exception (Kennedy) you have to be Protestant.

So it&#039;s mighty damn ignorant to say &quot;here&#039;s a black man who has a mere chance to be come president&quot; and start moaning and bellyaching about how Affirmative Action is ruining or meritocracy.

&lt;blockquote&gt;How can you not look at the fluff pieces in network news, CNN, MSNBC, People (front page, not a book review), Access Hollywood, the list continues and not say that he is getting preferential treatment to McCain?&lt;/blockquote&gt;I could do that, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmpa.com/Studies/Election08/election%20news%207_29_08.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;very easily&lt;/a&gt;.

There are many &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3316&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;substantive critiques&lt;/a&gt; that can be made of the media&#039;s coverage of McCain.

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3369
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3461
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3377

Ohh yeah &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fair.org/articles/mccain-bus.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&#039;s a goodie&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;When McCain referred to Vietnamese as &quot;gooks&quot; months ago, not one journalist objected and few reported it. (His campaign said last week he would discontinue using the term.) When he belittled the teenager, according to U.S. News and World Report, &quot;&lt;b&gt;one reporter just begged McCain to shut up and protect himself&lt;/b&gt;.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong</p></blockquote>
<p>You are, and I will . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>So the 43 white men were &#8220;Undoubtedly qualified&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees. The point is, I will state AGAIN, is that there is an Affirmative Action program in this country for white males.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s strictly enforced, and so far the only way to get into the Presidency.</p>
<p>If you want to be President, this AA program says you have to be white.</p>
<p>You have to be male.</p>
<p>And with one exception (Kennedy) you have to be Protestant.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s mighty damn ignorant to say &#8220;here&#8217;s a black man who has a mere chance to be come president&#8221; and start moaning and bellyaching about how Affirmative Action is ruining or meritocracy.</p>
<blockquote><p>How can you not look at the fluff pieces in network news, CNN, MSNBC, People (front page, not a book review), Access Hollywood, the list continues and not say that he is getting preferential treatment to McCain?</p></blockquote>
<p>I could do that, <a href="http://www.cmpa.com/Studies/Election08/election%20news%207_29_08.htm" rel="nofollow">very easily</a>.</p>
<p>There are many <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3316" rel="nofollow">substantive critiques</a> that can be made of the media&#8217;s coverage of McCain.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3369" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3369</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3461" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3461</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3377" rel="nofollow">http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3377</a></p>
<p>Ohh yeah <a href="http://www.fair.org/articles/mccain-bus.html" rel="nofollow">here&#8217;s a goodie</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>When McCain referred to Vietnamese as &#8220;gooks&#8221; months ago, not one journalist objected and few reported it. (His campaign said last week he would discontinue using the term.) When he belittled the teenager, according to U.S. News and World Report, &#8220;<b>one reporter just begged McCain to shut up and protect himself</b>.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doo</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14730</link>
		<dc:creator>Doo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14730</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but to be &quot;qualified&quot; to be president:

You have to be a natural-born US Citizen 
You have to be at least 35 years of age.
You have to reside in the US for at least 14 years. 

So the 43 white men were &quot;Undoubtedly qualified&quot;  

How can you not look at the fluff pieces in network news, CNN, MSNBC, People (front page, not a book review), Access Hollywood, the list continues and not say that he is getting preferential treatment to McCain?

Give America a palatable candidate, and it will not matter what color he/she is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but to be &#8220;qualified&#8221; to be president:</p>
<p>You have to be a natural-born US Citizen<br />
You have to be at least 35 years of age.<br />
You have to reside in the US for at least 14 years. </p>
<p>So the 43 white men were &#8220;Undoubtedly qualified&#8221;  </p>
<p>How can you not look at the fluff pieces in network news, CNN, MSNBC, People (front page, not a book review), Access Hollywood, the list continues and not say that he is getting preferential treatment to McCain?</p>
<p>Give America a palatable candidate, and it will not matter what color he/she is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaine</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14728</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14728</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think the real point is that if someone does not support Obama, it has to be that the person is a racist, or will not support anybody but the old standard WASP.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Nobody&#039;s said anything of the sort.

The real point is that there is a very pervasive yet unspoken form of Affirmative Action that has limited the highest office of the land to 100% white men.

It&#039;s slightly less effective in limiting management positions or Fortune 500 CEO&#039;s and other such highly desired positions but yet if a black guy comes along and *might* buck the trend that has kept EVERY SINGLE BLACK MAN IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICA out of the Presidency he&#039;s somehow receiving special treatment!

The 43 white men before him? Undoubtedly qualified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think the real point is that if someone does not support Obama, it has to be that the person is a racist, or will not support anybody but the old standard WASP.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nobody&#8217;s said anything of the sort.</p>
<p>The real point is that there is a very pervasive yet unspoken form of Affirmative Action that has limited the highest office of the land to 100% white men.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s slightly less effective in limiting management positions or Fortune 500 CEO&#8217;s and other such highly desired positions but yet if a black guy comes along and *might* buck the trend that has kept EVERY SINGLE BLACK MAN IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICA out of the Presidency he&#8217;s somehow receiving special treatment!</p>
<p>The 43 white men before him? Undoubtedly qualified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doo</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14725</link>
		<dc:creator>Doo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14725</guid>
		<description>I think the real point is that if someone does not support Obama, it has to be that the person is a racist, or will not support anybody but the old standard WASP.  
Obama is a wasP, or 62.5% WASP.  the reason that Obama does not get my support is because he is:
A: A socialist
B: A socialist
C: A socialist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real point is that if someone does not support Obama, it has to be that the person is a racist, or will not support anybody but the old standard WASP.<br />
Obama is a wasP, or 62.5% WASP.  the reason that Obama does not get my support is because he is:<br />
A: A socialist<br />
B: A socialist<br />
C: A socialist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaine</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14722</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14722</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why not, Blaire, you seem to ignore quite a bit as it suits you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yet another (boring and trite) ad hominem.

Can you do better? Substantiate your claims at least?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why not, Blaire, you seem to ignore quite a bit as it suits you.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yet another (boring and trite) ad hominem.</p>
<p>Can you do better? Substantiate your claims at least?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14716</link>
		<dc:creator>The Machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14716</guid>
		<description>Why not, Blaire, you seem to ignore quite a bit as it suits you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not, Blaire, you seem to ignore quite a bit as it suits you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaine</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14709</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14709</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re ignoring the real point because one part of the sentence was out of order?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re ignoring the real point because one part of the sentence was out of order?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doo</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14708</link>
		<dc:creator>Doo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14708</guid>
		<description>&quot;we got 43 White Anglo-Saxon and 42 Protestant male presidents in a row,&quot;

Reread that and tell me if you see ANY falsehood in 42 Protestant presidents in a row.  

Small point, but small points are important, like the fact that there are not 57 states, or that the Russians liberated Nuremberg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;we got 43 White Anglo-Saxon and 42 Protestant male presidents in a row,&#8221;</p>
<p>Reread that and tell me if you see ANY falsehood in 42 Protestant presidents in a row.  </p>
<p>Small point, but small points are important, like the fact that there are not 57 states, or that the Russians liberated Nuremberg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaine</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14707</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14707</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Barack Obama may well be our first Affirmative Action president.&lt;/blockquote&gt;The guy in the White House right now &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushresume.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;beat him to it&lt;/a&gt;.

Since it is PURE coincidence that we got 43 White Anglo-Saxon and 42 Protestant male presidents in a row, it&#039;s important to note that when one gets close to note that we can assume he&#039;s not qualified.

1. He&#039;s not white
2. He&#039;s neither Anglo nor Saxon
3. He&#039;s a SECRET Muslim

His only qualification seems to be male. But not a real man mind you - he&#039;d never strut around in a flight suit with stuffed pants nearly as well as Dubya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Barack Obama may well be our first Affirmative Action president.</p></blockquote>
<p>The guy in the White House right now <a href="http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushresume.htm" rel="nofollow">beat him to it</a>.</p>
<p>Since it is PURE coincidence that we got 43 White Anglo-Saxon and 42 Protestant male presidents in a row, it&#8217;s important to note that when one gets close to note that we can assume he&#8217;s not qualified.</p>
<p>1. He&#8217;s not white<br />
2. He&#8217;s neither Anglo nor Saxon<br />
3. He&#8217;s a SECRET Muslim</p>
<p>His only qualification seems to be male. But not a real man mind you &#8211; he&#8217;d never strut around in a flight suit with stuffed pants nearly as well as Dubya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thekingtut</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14696</link>
		<dc:creator>thekingtut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14696</guid>
		<description>Ron, you know the answer to that. You can have a Republican in an SS uniform, killing little black children and that&#039;s ok. But even try to print something negative about the MESSiah, and the mobs come at you with torches and pitchforks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, you know the answer to that. You can have a Republican in an SS uniform, killing little black children and that&#8217;s ok. But even try to print something negative about the MESSiah, and the mobs come at you with torches and pitchforks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14209</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14209</guid>
		<description>Will we hear cries that this cover is agist?  I mean there is a walker in his hand.  Oh and look at W&#039;s ears.  Didn&#039;t one &#039;expert&#039; say that because Barack&#039;s characture had big ears it was racist?!?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will we hear cries that this cover is agist?  I mean there is a walker in his hand.  Oh and look at W&#8217;s ears.  Didn&#8217;t one &#8216;expert&#8217; say that because Barack&#8217;s characture had big ears it was racist?!?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14096</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14096</guid>
		<description>Hmm, and yet, its the left that wants nothing to do with the Constitution....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, and yet, its the left that wants nothing to do with the Constitution&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.black-and-right.com/2008/07/30/the-medias-aa-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-14038</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.black-and-right.com/?p=8369#comment-14038</guid>
		<description>Is Vanity Fair that desperate for a circulation boost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Vanity Fair that desperate for a circulation boost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

